CPUs, Motherboards & RAM
Graphics Cards
Peripherals
Modding & Cooling
Systems
Networking
Security
Operating Systems
PC Games
Console Games
Atomic.edu
Tutorials
Lifestyle
Entertainment
Science
Merchandise
Wallpapers
Revolver Melbourne 2011
Revolver Sydney 2011
Atomic Unlocked 2010
Power to the PC Tour 2010
Industry Events
Login
|
Register
|
RSS
News
|
Reviews
|
Features
|
Podcasts
|
Opinions
|
Galleries
|
Videos
|
Competitions
|
Newsletter
|
Subscribe
Friday February 10, 2012 8:32 PM AEST
Atomic MPC
>
Features
>
Geek
>
Science
>
Large Hadron Collider? But I just met her!
Science
Large Hadron Collider? But I just met her!
By
Ashton Mills
14:55 Nov 19, 2008
|
3 Comments
Tags:
Large
|
Hadron
|
Collider
|
LHC
|
CERN
|
higgs
|
boson
Tweet
«
1 - Inside the LHC
2 - The Higgs whatchiwhat?
3 - Lightspeed collision
4 - Saving the LHC...
»
Related Articles
CERN cranks up its LHC network
CERN physicist arrested
Woman fails to stop the LHC
LHC fires 1.18TeV particle beam
First hypothesised in 1964, the Higgs-boson particle is a neat theory for a piece of the puzzle we don’t yet have.
The accepted ‘Standard Model’ of physics (for which we are well short of space to go into here) dictates that universe is made up of twelve fundamental particles governed by four fundamental forces. As a model, it’s become a standard because it’s successfully explained not only the results of many experiments over the years, but also successfully predicted a wide variety of phenomena that were later discovered.
So it works pretty well for us.
However it’s not complete: of the four forces it only successfully describes the strong force, the weak force, and the electromagnetic force through their corresponding force carrier particles that have been discovered (particles that transfer force energy between matter, and belong to a group of particles called ‘bosons’).
Gravity, though we know it exists, hasn’t yet been explained by a corresponding force particle. The Standard Model theorises it should exist, but it hasn’t yet been found.
So there’s still more work to be done.
Another missing component, which much of the model depends on, is the Higgs-boson. It’s just a theory, but one that satisfies an inexplicable loophole. It runs something like this:
The Standard Model states that electricity, magnetism, light and some types of radioactivity are all manifestations of a single underlying force called the ‘electroweak force’ – one of the four fundamental forces. Mathematically for this to be true the theory for force particles requires they should have no mass, but this has already been disproven. Which means although the Standard Model seems to accurately describe what we see in the universe, it’s also missing something.
One of numerous physicists working on it, a physicist called Peter Higgs, proposed a theory by which matter gets its mass and which later became known as the Higgs mechanism. The Higgs mechanism defines a gigantic field created in the Big Bang that spreads across all time and space called (not surprisingly) the Higgs field, indistinguishable from empty space, and through which all matter interacts. And it’s the Higgs field that gives matter its mass, with particles that interact with it as they move through it gaining more mass than those that don’t.
A good analogy here is to imagine an object moving through a viscous substance like honey – the honey slows it down, and the bigger the object the more honey it will interact with and the more it will be slowed. The theory goes that some particles, like photons in light, aren’t being affected much at all by the field while others, like the particles that form the building blocks of the atoms in your body, are. And the magic ingredient that endows mass from the Higgs field to the interacting particle is the Higgs-boson.
It may sound like a convinient theory, but it’s the best we have – physicists can’t currently explain, for example, why one particle has a different mass to another, or even why particles have mass at all. There are many characteristics we know about particles, like charge or spin, but none of these dictate or create mass. Said another way: as far as our understanding of particle physics goes, mass doesn’t exist. But you only have to hold your hand in front of your face to see it does – so how does mass get there?
If the Higgs-boson particle exists, the LHC should be able to find it. If it does, it will complete a great void in our understanding of the universe and open up a whole new school of physics. If it doesn’t that’s good too – it means the Higgs field theory is wrong and we can go back to the drawing board and see what else we can come up with. Either way is progress, and why the LHC is so fundamental to the understanding of physics today.
«
1 - Inside the LHC
2 - The Higgs whatchiwhat?
3 - Lightspeed collision
4 - Saving the LHC...
»
This article appeared in the
November, 2008
issue of Atomic.
Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
Purchase your copy now - only $8.95 including postage
Subscribe to our digital version - only $49.95 a year
Email this
Print this
Tweet this
Send us your tips
Ads by Google
3 Comments
SceptreCore
Nov 19, 2008 4:10 PM
More, more!
Athiril
Nov 19, 2008 7:41 PM
Proof read the article next time ;)
"After first kicking them, the beams are then ‘diluted’ by a series of ten special magnets that scatter the beam and reduce its intensity by some 100,000 times. At this stage they’ll still bore a hole in most any substance"
sifn't this thing couldnt destroy the earth... they forgot to mention in the center of the loop is a canon/death ray that's aimed at another planet we've never heard of.
Wine
Nov 27, 2008 5:35 PM
I always find bad puns in science mags, are these puns intentional or the creative runoff of science writers madness?
Comments have been disabled on this article.
Five things that could kill Mass Effect 3
HD7970 vs GTX 780: the future of graphics cards in 2012
The Darkness
Creation Kit and Steam Workshop for Skyrim go live, Texture Pack released
PS3 pwns retail, while Xbox also... pwns... huh?
Powered by Disqus
Latest Competitions
Thermaltake kicks off your gaming year with a BANG
Thermaltake has started off the new year with a bang by giving away a Tt eSport Theron Laser mouse to not one or two, but TWENTY lucky Atomicans!
Atomic Magazine
Issue:
133
|
February, 2012
Atomic
is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.
Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
What's in this issue?
Subscribe Now
Buy this issue
Digital Version
Latest Comments
Powered by Disqus
Latest User Reviews
90%
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
By
Periander
|
10:59 Nov 20, 2011
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
By
mattleyland
|
14:23 Oct 28, 2011
90%
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
By
mattleyland
|
12:55 Oct 28, 2011
90%
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
This product overall is awesome.
By
Provodnik14
|
10:43 Oct 16, 2011
90%
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
Nice laptop
By
daryl.cheshire
|
00:53 Oct 4, 2011
more user reviews »
Get the February, 2012 issue of
Atomic
mailed to you for
$8.95
, including postage.
Subscribe
Buy now
Digital Version