Wednesday May 23, 2012 3:09 PM AEST

A tale of two gamers

By James Matson, David Hollingworth
12:37 Dec 15, 2008 | 16 Comments
Tags: A | tale | of | two | gamers
« 
A tale of two gamers
DH: Stargate Worlds, as much as I dig its franchise, really doesn’t work for me as a game, I have to admit. And what is it about fantasy that seems to lend itself to MMOs more than SF does, I wonder?

But anyway, let’s look ahead. It’s just been announced that SOE is going to start doing item purchases with real world money – things like vanity gear, potions and similar vaguely low impact stuff. The KOTOR MMO is also going to be ditching subscriptions and going with some kind of micro-transaction profit model... do you think we’re going to start seeing some shifts in how people make money via MMO marketing and games?

JM: You know, it’s not something I’d ever considered but now that I’ve heard about it, it makes concrete sense. The monthly subscription model seems perpetuated among MMOs only because it’s what’s always been done before. When it works the company makes stacks of cash and gamers are by and large happy to pay it. But when it doesn’t work, it usually results in the game world folding like a cheap deck chair. It’s understandable that companies will seek new ways to make money out of games; it’s been happening outside the MMO market for a little while now. Gems like advertising in games to generate revenue or First-Person-Shooters where people can fight others for the taking (or losing) of real cash – it’s all just another step in the direction of your cracked and stinky leather wallet.

I actually like Sony’s idea of Station Cash, it’s well thought out. Like you said, it’s low impact stuff – nothing that can drastically alter the balance of play against those who don’t buy the goods, but it provides an avenue to something most MMO players crave; freaking awesome looking characters. The ‘vanity’ gear will most likely have no stats or bonuses, but simply look shit hot – and there’s no denying a big part of the appeal of the ‘hard to get’ (see: raid) gear in MMOs is that it screams ‘pimped Godbeing from the sky’ to other players. The purchasable vanity gear is the answer for those who want to look fab, without spending hours raiding at 3:00AM on a Tuesday morning with a US guild. From scouring the web, it’s going to cost about $A1.60 for 1,000SC (Station Cash) but there’s no telling yet how much value that 1,000 will get you.

The whingers will complain that it’s another attempt by the big bad MMO developing crowd to leave you penniless on the street, but It’s a take it or leave it thing, so no one is bound to purchase the in-game cash, but it provides players with even more options to customise their toons and provides Sony with a bit of extra cash from EverQuest and EverQuest II; which, for those of us who are still adventuring around the land of Norrath, means the servers stay online longer. I think the general shift towards freaky new revenue methods for gaming have been gaining momentum for a while. I’m all for it on the condition it provides me – the gamer – with a better end product for my dollar. If that doesn’t happen, well – I can tell you where I’ll be sticking my Sword of the Bloodmoon.


DH: Uh, no one wants you to tell them that.

Post Script: In the time it took us to actually have this conversation, Age of Conan devs announced it’s definitely still on track to release on the 360 ('cause it's done SO WELL on PC), new character classes have hit Warhammer Online, World of Warcraft has announced sex changes as a character option, and Star Trek MMO developer Cryptic Studios was bought out by Atari’s parent company, Infogrames. It’s a fast moving virtual world out there.
 
« 
 
Aliens: Colonial Marines in depth; Z-77 Motherboard round-up; strategy gaming special; Home Server tutorial. PLUS MUCH MORE - ON SALE NOW!
16 Comments
iamthemaxx
Dec 15, 2008 2:25 PM
Neeeerds!
Hawkeye
Dec 15, 2008 2:42 PM
Don't judge us, man!
Fat_Bodybuilder
Dec 15, 2008 2:52 PM
too late >.>
Hawkeye
Dec 15, 2008 2:55 PM
Damn.
Amiga4eva
Dec 15, 2008 3:06 PM
Judge us. Harshly.

For we know not how to engage the world of life without a pocket full of D20's, or how to talk to a female without our Wizard's hats on.

We are spell casting, critical hit scoring, chips & gravy swillin Nerds.

Yeah. YEAH!
Hawkeye
Dec 15, 2008 3:15 PM
You're not helping.
Amiga4eva
Dec 15, 2008 3:21 PM
Sorry man, I'll try to keep it under wraps from now on.

But, while I've got you here, are we still on for that costume dressup recreation of the Battle of Helms Deep tonight at your joint?

I couldn't find the chalk colored tights you wanted for the Elven costume, so I had to settle for a light grey color. All good?
Truckasauras
Dec 15, 2008 3:23 PM
I note a distinct avoidance of talking WoW (other then the odd comment). Do you guys not play WoW?
Amiga4eva
Dec 15, 2008 3:29 PM
Truckasauras, I played it, enjoyed it for a while but gradually discovered it just didn't compare to EverQuest 2 on a whole range of levels that resulted in me ditching WoW for EQ2.

I'm sure my Undead Mage is still stored in the Blizzard vault for Bloodscalp somewhere.
Hawkeye
Dec 15, 2008 3:36 PM
I played a Night Elf warrior to 60 (oh, Thellazaron, you dark angsty Prince of Darnassus, you!), then came back for a few levels of Burning Crusade (and a Blood Elf Paladin), as well as numerous alts. I'd been playing pretty much from launch, but, like A4A, I got pulled away from WoW.

Though, for me, it was LotRO online that did the damage.
Truckasauras
Dec 15, 2008 5:00 PM
For the record, I love your name Amiga4eva. My first computer was an Amiga 500 and I loved that thing to bits (still do).

As for WoW. I stopped playing to pick up War but have been drawn back in with the release of WOTLK. Such a wonderful expansion.
Amiga4eva
Dec 15, 2008 6:03 PM
Truckasauras, you love Amiga's?

Well, you're a WoW'er I can respect! :).
Elfarch
Dec 16, 2008 12:35 AM
Way to many better games than WoW.
I'm spread way to thin between 4 atm plus hellgate and RL.
donkeyruler
Dec 16, 2008 4:48 PM
I play WoW too, loving the expansion, though I would really like to play LOTR
Hawkeye
Dec 16, 2008 4:59 PM
LotRO is really worth it - very different feel, though essentially similar dynamics. It's also one of the best looking MMOs graphically. Simply stunning.

- DH
dsagill
Dec 17, 2008 11:37 PM
I used to help sell Amigas and other Commodores in a local computer shop when I was 15/16 :)

Oh and (jock voice) NERRRRRRDDDDDDSSSSS :p

An accurate discussion though - I haven't ventured into anything other than WOW which I chucked in around 4 months ago. It just became a big yawn and I don't really give a crap about the new expansion or whatever.

I'd like to check out the others mentioned here but I'm getting so much done in my extra time now :)
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 137 | June, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop