Wednesday May 23, 2012 3:11 PM AEST

Great gamer myths

By Simon Brew
16:09 Feb 9, 2009 | 12 Comments
Tags: gamers | myths | culture
« 
Great gamer myths

Videogamers like thumping soundtracks to everything
It gets a bit boring after a while, doesn't it? Again, I'd urge those who think this to look at the videogames themselves and, well, listen to them? It just doesn't stack up, and it's not right to pin the cultural music choices of a given generation to one medium that doesn't even tend to exploit them very much. Plus: isn't it the responsibility of every generation to have music that their parents don't like?

Videogames cause the videogame generation to be violent
Nope. That'd be bad parenting, bad role models, and the usual pot pourri of contributory factors that must frustrate a 24-hour news channel looking for something simple to plug a gap with.

There's never been a proven link between videogames and crime, and never will be. And this is a lazy, generational thing that comes about every ten years or so anyway. In the 80s, it was video nasties. In the 90s, it was the likes of Natural Born Killers. And now it's games. Still, having a handy scapegoat does mean society doesn't have to look for real answers that are likely to be a great deal scarier...

Videogames have turned a generation in anti-social loners
No they haven't, and stop being silly.

Videogames, if anything, increasingly encourage people to play together, crossing age and gender divides. At Christmas, six or seven people were squeezed into my front room to play Wii games, for instance, ranging from a four year up to a pensioner. And everyone took part. That never used to happen with Scrabble 20 years ago. The kids in the street regularly gather together for a gaming session too.

Again, all this clouds a more sinister, more real reason, that fear in society is at a point where parents are scared to let their kids out. How about dealing with that, rather than wheeling out another Professor or snob to tell us how bad the "videogame generation" is?

Videogames are all aggressive and violent
Oh shut up. Take a look on the shelves of the game shop, and tell us how many have age restrictions on them. Not many, right? That's because a small proportion are violent, and the rest take in everything from board games, movie tie-ins, cookbooks, puzzle titles, silly little fun games and even, now, books on a cartridge. While some continue to dismiss the videogame generation, it's actually said generation - the older of whom are now in their 30s, remember - that are trying to do something about the problems in society.

These are just some of the lazy, common myths perpetrated about a generation that, ultimately, is very technically aware, and always has been. It's annoying to see how easily the term "videogame generation" gets banded around negatively with little thought of whether there's any substance to it. Sure, it's a generation with problems, as all generations have.

But let's actually talk about the problems, rather than making silly excuses and inventing scapegoats that simply don't hold much water?

 

 
« 

Copyright © 2010 Den of Geek

 
Aliens: Colonial Marines in depth; Z-77 Motherboard round-up; strategy gaming special; Home Server tutorial. PLUS MUCH MORE - ON SALE NOW!
12 Comments
orcone
Feb 9, 2009 4:46 PM
Hate reading?
How the fuck do they think we get info from the net!?
Trekker
Feb 9, 2009 5:51 PM
dream it as well go along
Dan_2
Feb 9, 2009 5:55 PM
I have to admit I don't read too many books. But I read plenty of magazines and news off websites. So it's not that we don't read it's just that we read from a different source, it's still reading..
clockworkman
Feb 9, 2009 5:56 PM
tldr!
:P
Lord-Ezekiel
Feb 9, 2009 7:01 PM
Your right on the money Simon - twas a good read :D
mattnelson
Feb 10, 2009 11:09 AM
Firstly a caveat: I'm not trying to offend with this post, although I admit in all likelihood it will offend. So, apologies in advance for any offence caused ;-)

This article is a bit too light for me to take very seriously. If it is a genuine attempt to address the real or imagined concerns with computer gamers from other segments of society I think it fails. It appears more as a flippant attempt to preach to the converted.

In my previous profession, aptitude in social situations was a key skill. It is from this perspective that I note a large majority of geeks/gamers I know posess extremely poor social skills in face to face interactions.

These same people are an entirely different proposition online, and present as self confident and articulate. I don't know why they can't transition these skills into the physical world. Perhaps it is a lack of practice or the conventions of online communication are so ingrained that the line blurs between the two for them.

I'm curious about the reason for the article. Where have these myths come from? Are there any sources or are they simply the imagined scorn from non-geeks?
strifus
Feb 11, 2009 12:02 AM
Who knows matt, but I will say this though, I agree with the author.

Give you a story. When I was 7, I had contact with my first PC, the IBM PC of course. Ever since then, I have been tinkering in front of the thing almost everyday of my life. At one point, my mother thought that I was spending too much time in front of it to the point that she said I will never amount to anything.

Now though, she has nothing to say. It is from computers that I make my living and a very very comfortable living I might add, not going into much detail. All this because I learnt how to program my own word processor, program my first home control system, particle add-ons for various 3D applications, and much more (probably the only thing I havent done is design a CPU).

These days I dont actually go to work. I get asked to go somewhere, and I get paid just doing travel. The point is matt, that you are right, the author is probably preaching to the converted. Whether or not the myths are non-existant or not, it is the public in general who need to know this.
coolbeans59
Feb 11, 2009 2:41 AM
That was painful to read ... and was clearly written from a totally biased viewpoint (and possibly uneducated, as well). Where's the academic studies? Where's the research to backup these beliefs? What is 'Simon Brew' doing this as a sophomore term paper for Mr. Tanner's Special Ed English class? UGH!

Listen, I agree with most of what he says ... but one exception I take ....

"Videogamers don't play sports, read books and do other things"

As a former HS coach, I saw this with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears. There were a few kids that we wanted to come out ... but they said they'd rather play Madden than put in the effort in real life. But it brings up a valid Q ... if there wasn't video games, would they still find an excuse to not come out? Maybe ... but I know what I saw I heard and video games were an excuse.

Either way, that kind of logic and reason is clearly missed in this article.
rockleex
Feb 11, 2009 2:46 AM
@mattnelson:

Maybe that's because most gamers you know are geeks who happen to be gamers.

My group of friends who are gamers are very diversified. Ethnically, we range from Caucasian to black to Asian to Latino, etc. Personally, we range from nerds to geeks to sports players to "thugs", etc. Yes, we have female gamer friends too. In fact my younger sister is a gamer herself, yet she's very athletic.

Each of us perform differently in social environments. Most of us would never have talked to each other or became friends if not for videogames. The point is that video games reach across all borders.

Anyways, the fact that you state geeks and gamers as one in the same thing helps to further display the general misconceptions about videogames/videogamers.
Mordecai
Feb 11, 2009 8:48 AM
Gamers don't/can't read? ... *looks at his bookshelf with over 150 novels on it* yeah, right. I read FAR more then my non gaming friends. I generally try read a novel or two a week and none that I own are based on games.
mattnelson
Feb 11, 2009 11:44 AM
‘strifus’: I did not imply anywhere that a good living cannot be made through a love of IT. I think you’ve missed my point. Good for you for making something of yourself although it is a little out of context and unseemly to make reference to your means ;-)

‘rockleex’: I’m fully aware of the difference between geeks and gamers and I didn’t intend to claim they were one and the same.

So what is a video gamer? The article fails to give any real definition to the term. Are we talking about my Dad who cracks on with a game of Singstar and Buzz when we have a party at our place, or are we talking about a person for whom computer gaming is a hobby in which significant time and money is invested?

I’m simply stating, and will stand by my claim that the vast majority of people I know who fall into the latter category are socially immature compared to my friends who do not play video games. Both groups include people ranging in ages from 8 – 45. My wife has also noted that her students who spend significant amounts of time playing video games suffer more difficulties with social interaction than those who do not. She does not judge them as I do not judge my friends and colleagues, these are merely observations we have made.

It’s all very well to blame the parents, and indeed, many deserve a LOT of the blame, however bad parents have, and always will exist. That is a societal issue we will probably never solve short of sterilising all the bogans (whoops! Did I just say that out loud?). One of the key questions for me is, have video games caused new issues for those children of bad parents that previously would not have existed? This is an issue we are far more likely to deal with successfully, and no, I am not advocating video game bans here ;-) Far from being anti-computer gaming, I thoroughly enjoy them as many members of this community can attest.

The article also fails to provide information regarding who is saying all these bad things about gamers other than an article the author read in Wall Street Journal, and a hazy reference to “reports” in Singapore.

This topic is one I am genuinely interested in, and it offends me that atomic (a publication I’ve enjoyed reading since 2003) should take such a shallow stab at the issue. This article only serves to reinforce the opinions of the naysayer that gamers are antagonistic and immature.

My response was not intended as a personal dig at the author, but a friendly barb to treat the issue as seriously as most gamers think it is. There is a serious lack of useful, intelligent debate on this subject and I fear this article has done nothing to remedy that.
Arch3r
Feb 17, 2009 7:59 PM
I'm a gaming enthusiast and i read more that most people i know as friends, 1 of which who would read more also considers herself a gamer and reads 3-4 novels a week.

As for "Who is a Gamer", It is my opinion that anyone who would call themselves a gamer is one, yes i have friends that play games like sing star and buzz but they wouldn't called themselves gamers but there are others who may, it is a self appointed title and can be one of the most diverse terms out there.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 137 | June, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop