ASUS' M4A89GTD PRO Core Unlocker actually works

By Justin Robinson
15:04 Apr 9, 2010 | 15 Comments
Tags: ASUS | M4A89GTD | PRO | mobo | motherboard | 890GX | AMD | Core | Unlocker
 »
ASUS' M4A89GTD PRO Core Unlocker actually works

Techspection: ASUS gives you extra cores for free; but are there downsides?

AMD have stuck with their Phenom architecture for a few years now, a special design when compared to previous chips. It's a monolithic die that includes all four cores as one single immovable chunk, and while this gives the benefit of tightly integrated caches, it has caused problems with AMD's yields to the point where they've had to create a novel - and effective - way of selling most of the chips they manufacture.

The answer, as we first saw in mid 2008, was to take the monolithic quadcore Phenom dies with imperfections, determine which areas of the chip were faulty, and deactivate them. With the faulty core (and later, up to three cores) deactivated, the remaining cores could be sold as a triple- or dual-cored processor, albeit at a lower retail price owing to reduced performance.

However, unlike the difference between Intel's dual and quad chips, these deactivated cores were not physically removed at all. Even more astoundingly, the demand for AMD's dual and triple core chips were so high that their manufacturing process didn't produce enough errors to meet it, and they artificially created 'faulty' chips with extra missing cores.

The enthusiast community isn't one to stand idly by with knowledge like that, and in February of 2009 we saw that the Phenom II X3 chips could be unlocked to create an effective X4 when running in the 790GX chipset. Well, that ability is returning with the 890GX chipset, and ASUS have placed themselves at the forefront of processor unlocking with their M4A89TDG PRO board - which comes with a feature called 'Core Unlocker'.

We grabbed an AMD Phenom X2 550 chip, which is a dual-core processor that runs at a stock speed of 3.1GHz, and threw it into the mobo alongside 4GB of G.Skill RAM at 1600MHz with 8-8-8-24 timings. The Core Unlocker is activated with a simple hardware switch, manually changing BIOS settings and by hitting the '4' key during POST. If all went as planned (and each of the three methods worked just fine for us), the board will POST in a similar way to usual, with the addition of this handy message:

click to view full size image
Four cores activated!

But however confident the BIOS appears to be, did this really give us two completely functioning cores?

 

 
 »
 
Aliens: Colonial Marines in depth; Z-77 Motherboard round-up; strategy gaming special; Home Server tutorial. PLUS MUCH MORE - ON SALE NOW!
15 Comments
NobodyIsHere
Apr 9, 2010 3:59 PM
Its ashame that AMD took it out on the 890GX.
Here's hoping that the 890FX comes with core unlocking or board partners like asus will add it if it doesn't.
Splinter277
Apr 9, 2010 5:13 PM
So as far as I'm aware, there still the chance of receiving a 'true', broken-cored chip. Which kinda makes buying an X2 a bit of hit/miss since nothing is guaranteed.

Ah well, I still buy my Athlons nice and cheap, my Core 2's in my rig.
KayDat
Apr 9, 2010 11:40 PM
I bought my 550 June last year, and it unlocked all four cores fine on a Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H mobo. Haven't had too much luck overclocking after unlocking, but I never really spent too much time or effort.
KayDat
Apr 10, 2010 12:11 AM
There's actually a thread going on in Xtreme Systems forum where people are listing their steppings and successes/failures with unlocking. Unfortunately, the OP has stopped updating the thread.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=227004
nukejockey
Apr 10, 2010 2:22 PM
How come you doctored the core temps out of the occt screen cap?
TheFrunj
Apr 10, 2010 3:10 PM
nukejockey, you talking about the pic on page 3? It's not doctored at all, that's a rather arrogant assumption. Temps didn't appear to be monitored with OCCT, nor did they appear with Coretemp 0.99.5
nukejockey
Apr 10, 2010 4:40 PM
Weird, only assumed that it was doctored because of the weird red lines running across the part of occt where temps are normally displayed. Hardly arrogant =/
robzy
Apr 10, 2010 5:53 PM
This still concerns me from a stability perspective. For all we know an error might occur with some obscure rarely used instruction, which wouldn't be too bad until you actually find a program that triggers it.
gamble
Apr 11, 2010 12:32 AM
When I unlock my 4th core the temps dont show up correctly in any program, with cpuid I use CPUTIN to monitor temps. Even AMD Overdrive shows 0 for temp when unlocked.

I tested the crap out of my unlocked cpu and never had a problem with stablility, unless it is OC to high.
KayDat
Apr 11, 2010 6:42 AM
Oh yeah, that's right...you lose CPU temperature monitoring when you unlock cores, so you'll have to rely on the mobo "CPU temperature" probe...assuming you have one. Just spend some time comparing temperatures between built-in CPU temperature and the mobo probe at different loads, watching temperatures rise and fall, you'll get a good idea on the differences. I found my mobo probe actually reacted to temperature rises faster than the CPU probe, but was slower on dropping temperatures.
But yes, unlocked cores run faster than at stock.
Antraman
Apr 11, 2010 3:11 PM
Hmmm, I get the "4 cores are activated!" message on my M4A79T-deluxe board, after modding the BIOS with an SLIC key, and thats using a Quad 955 BE and not doing any core unlocking...wierd.
Count
Apr 12, 2010 9:41 AM
"But however confident the BIOS appears to be, did this really give us two completely functioning cores?"

Of course not, it gave you FOUR completely functioning cores.
TheFrunj
Apr 12, 2010 10:36 AM
Actually we already had two functioning cores, it gave us two more :P Or more accurately - it gave us one more!
nukejockey
Apr 12, 2010 11:10 AM
Any idea if the temps are raised much by activating the extra cores? (I'm sorry about the last comment TF, I didnt mean sound like I was calling you out about hiding temps, please forgive me!)
TheFrunj
Apr 12, 2010 12:21 PM
Aw, nukey, you're forgiven :P I did feel the base of the TRUE under each load (before and after unlocking the chip), and three cores did 'feel' hotter. That said, the heatsink barely got warm at all, and could've warmed over time. Without a temp probe it'd be hard to say for sure! It should have increased, though.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 137 | June, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop