Sunday March 21, 2010 7:02 PM AEST

Safari 3.01 Beta for Windows

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
«  »
Safari 3.01 Beta for Windows
By James Matson
Jun 20, 2007
Tags: Safari | 3.01 | Beta | for | Windows | firefox | comparison
The Comparison

While Safari looks nice, we all know that the meat of the matter is performance. Even those few milliseconds of render time saved in one browser might put it head and shoulders over others. In order to get a good feel for how Safari stacks up against the competition, we ran some benchmarking against popular Windows browsers, namely Internet Explorer 7, Opera 9.21 and Firefox 3 (Minefield Alpha).

click to view full size image
With the goal of being as true to typeface standards as possible, Safari on Windows sacrifices clarity and sharpness in favour of rounded lettering. Note in particular bolded characters tend to bleed into each other more.

click to view full size image
Microsoft is happy to squash the shape of each letter into the pixel boundaries of the screen. This improves on-screen readability in browsers that maintain the Windows default rendering algorithm, but you lose out on the subtle differences between font types at smaller sizes.



The Performance

While it’s difficult to truly form concrete opinions when benching a Beta versus final products (and even an Alpha) it still provides a sense of what we’re in for. We wanted to know the footprint on the system, such as the install size and memory usage, as well as what deviations there were in download speed, standards compliance and CSS rendering. All testing was done on with the following set up - Win XP SP2, Core2 Duo E6300, 2GB DDR2 memory and each test ran 3 times for average results.


 Internet Explorer 7Firefox 3 (Minefield) AlphaOpera 9.21Safari 3.0 (Beta)
Install Size3.44MB22.2MB5.19MB27.5MB
Memory Usage38,032KB29,768KB23,876KB50,592KB
MSU Speed Test (1MB file)10.4 seconds12.3 seconds23.6 secondsUnknown
CSS Rendering Test250ms234ms219ms31ms
Page load (cnn.com)11.2 seconds10.9 seconds11.1 seconds9.1 seconds
Acid 2 TestFAILPASSPASSPASS
Google Image search “Laserz” 7.3 seconds6.3 seconds14.9 seconds3.6 seconds



So what have we learned? In both memory usage and install Safari is the fatty of the group, which in terms of install size could be indicative of the fact Apple has tried to bundle no less than three other products with the browser, Quicktime, Bonjour and Apple Update. Nasty. Our CSS rendering test comprised of the load time for a page containing roughly 2500 positioned DIVs, with Safari winning out ever so slightly on speed. Safari fared well in a load time comparison for a Google Image search, snappily bringing up a page of associated pictures 2.9 seconds faster than Firefox and leaving Opera for dust.

All the browsers bar IE7 passed the Acid 2 test (a render check for web standards).

The MSU speed test which gives you the total time of a 1MB download, had to be given an ‘unknown’ rating. The MSU speed test and Safari don’t play well together at this point, with the website reporting that on a 1500Kbps ADSL connection, it took 0.0324 seconds to download 1MB. Well, we can dream can’t we?

Where Apple really likes to sound the horn is in relation to Javascript execution time, their website claiming execution of JavaScript up to 2.8 times faster than Internet Explorer 7 and up to 1.6 times faster than Firefox.

Our benchmark – using the jsspeed.php webpage, revealed they aren’t actually far off the mark with Opera the only serious competition.


 Internet Explorer 7Firefox 3 (Minefield) AlphaOpera 9.21Safari 3.0 (Beta)
Javascript Speed Test1500ms828ms235ms187ms


Safari certainly seems to have the guts of a good browser inside it, offering speed where it’s paramount - the rendering of text and images.


 
«  »
 
Want to check out the first Australian review of Final Fantasy XIII? We got in this month's Atomic!

Plus HD projectors, Napoleon: Total War, Intel's new six-core processor, PC upgrading guide, and a whole lot more.

ON SALE NOW!
Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 111 | April, 2010

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
"Send your good taste to celebration by delivering our mouthwatering cakes to Dehradun and exotic ..."
by rony24 | Mar 20, 2010 4:56 PM
 
"So. Much. Awesome."
by The Manta | Mar 20, 2010 4:23 PM
 
"@sirtrancealot, BF started on the PC and BC1 only on Consoles was a kick to the PC gamers ..."
by NRUFrost | Mar 20, 2010 8:14 AM
 
"RAGE!!!"
by Hawkeye | Mar 20, 2010 1:24 AM
 
"alex - bugger all. 78mg of caffeine. About the same as a cup of instant coffee. Taurine, Gurana ..."
by tantryl | Mar 20, 2010 12:51 AM
 
1) Nokia E7147 plans 33%
2) Apple iPhone 3GS 32GB36 plans 33%
3) Apple iPhone 8GB43 plans 22%
4) HTC Magic5 plans 33%
5) Nokia N9740 plans 33%
1) iiNet32 plans 100%
2) Optus41 plans 14%
3) Vodafone7 plans 5%
4) Telstra BigPond30 plans 1%
5) Dodo34 plans 6%

Mobiles | Broadband | Credit Cards

Haymarket - Atomic MPC
Latest User Reviews
Logitech MX518 Gaming-Grade Optical Mouse
90%
Good shape, design and Ergonomics
 
Coolermaster HAF 922
100%
A case to make a statment and give your pc the Heavy Hardcore Grunt it needs.
 
Coolermaster Excalibur
50%
Atomic is under attack
 
XFX 9300 Motherboard
40%
HUGE letdown
 
CM Storm Sentinel gaming mouse
90%
Sexy and instant geek respect.