Friday February 10, 2012 11:56 AM AEST

Sub-$250 graphics cards

By Justin Robinson
17:07 Feb 18, 2009 | 5 Comments
Tags: video | cards | budget | gaming
 »
Sub-$250 graphics cards

Eleven cards. Lotsa testing. We compare the current crop of budget video cards on the market.

Here at Atomic we’re used to the biggest, fastest and best. But sometimes this isn’t always practical, nor realistic in the real world to always be on the bleeding edge. Naturally, and struck with some inspiration, we decided to find out so that you don’t have to.

With cards ranging from the low-end to mid-high-end, and prices from all walks of life, we have benched cards from ATI and NVIDIA, and evaluated each one. There are so many cards out there on the market, how is a budding enthusiast or wizened guru going to choose the best for their needs? Well, enter Atomic.

First we took the eleven cards, and threw them together inside a locked room. We checked back on them a few weeks later, and discovered who the victor was. Was it an NVIDIA card, or an ATI card? Was it horrendously expensive, or surprisingly affordable? Was there a victor, or did each card manage to finish the others off completely? The answer, as always, lies just over the next few pages.

How we tested
Graphics cards are a relatively simple affair to test. Each result can be kept comparable to the next as we can use the one test rig – meaning that performance is relative to each other card in this roundup. Many different readings were taken, and any standout features or issues were noted.

Here are the specs for the test rig:Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Intel E8400 @ 333x 9 = 3000MHz
TeamXtreem DDR2 @ 1066MHz
Antec TruePower Quattro 1000W
WD Velociraptor 300GB
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme

The operating system was Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit SP1, with no audio or network drivers installed. Drivers used for NVIDIA cards were Foreceware 180.42, while ATI cards were treated to a beta release of Catalyst 8.11.

Four benchmarks were used with the cards, including the Crysis built-in GPU test, the Company of Heroes built-in test, 3DMark06 and 3DMark Vantage. Both 3DMark programs were run at default settings, while the games were run at 1280x1024, all settings set to High, with 4xAA used in CoH only.

Sound measurements were taken with our magical sound probey stick of wonder (otherwise known as a sound-level meter), and temperatures were recorded via the latest version of GPU-Z, 0.28. Where temperatures would not report, our expert fingers felt instead. Just remember that if you’re going to attempt to emulate the extremely manly, modest and powerful Atomic Staff, to be careful that you don’t burn yourself!

All these benchmark tools are readily available to download for free online, and if you’ve bought the games, they have them enabled and ready to use. Feel free to compare your results to ours, and see where your rig stacks up in the budget world. Just keep in mind any discrepancies in CPU or other factors if you get a different score to ours with the same card.

Check out our nifty comparison table as well, to, well, compare the different cards. The graphs are also quite handy for those who need to see a visual, or don’t have time to read the text.

Now that you know how we went about testing, flip the page to get into it!

 
 »
 
This article appeared in the January 09 issue of Atomic.

Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
5 Comments
cleadge
Feb 18, 2009 6:31 PM
i think thar is a typo in the first chart "3dMark06 points per dollar - [b]lower[/b] is better."
azn_warez
Feb 18, 2009 9:05 PM
I thought the HD4850 can be had for $240 right?
heydude
Feb 19, 2009 11:36 AM
No mention of power requirements???

The ati 4670 does not even need any external power connector and pulls those frame rates, pretty impressive.
And the card can run on a crappy psu.
Not to mention its stellar power reduction in windows,
it drops to 165mhz gpu clock and 250mhz mem clock in
windows dropping power requirements for a trully green
card that can game as well.

Well if I spent that much time on reviewing these cards
I think I would have mentioned that.

Not to mention that the his version comes with a brilliant
cooler that exhuasts the heat out the back of the case.
TheFrunj
Feb 20, 2009 11:06 AM
Hi heydude,

While we'd have certainly liked to have included power measurements for the budget-skewed angle, we actually didn't think of it at the time. However there is a handy thread on the forums that does list the power draw of those cards:
http://forums.atomicmpc.com.au/index.php?showtopic=264

*makes mental note to get power meter for next budget roundup*

-JR
heydude
Feb 20, 2009 12:57 PM
Thanks TheFrunj, I mentioned it because we always hear of how power efficient cpu's are, but in something like graphics that reasoning generally goes out the window for some strange reason. Must be frame rates, lol.

Cheers.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Latest Competitions
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 133 | February, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop
 
 
Close Get the February, 2012 issue of Atomic mailed to you for $8.95, including postage.

SubscribeBuy nowDigital Version