Thursday May 24, 2012 2:17 PM AEST

Sub-$250 graphics cards

By Justin Robinson
17:07 Feb 18, 2009 | 5 Comments
Tags: video | cards | budget | gaming
« 
Sub-$250 graphics cards
So, which one won?
If one were studious enough in their observation of the graphs, you’d have noticed something quite interesting about the value of each of these cards. You’d also notice, of course, the performance. But what does this all mean, and how is this going to help you decide which card you’re going to buy next? Well, we’ve made some categories to give you that extra edge when taking the final plunge.

Best Performance
Win: GIGABYTE 9800GT Nearly-win: Elitegroup 8800GT
It goes without saying that in this roundup, there has been one card at the top of the deck throughout the entire time. The Gigabyte 9800GT was able to pull ahead in every single test, giving us the best performance, with a very good amount of memory, cooling and overclocking headroom. Not only that, but it looks rather interesting too!

This one isn’t the best in terms of value, nor is it the best for your buck, but if you do grab this one you’ll be very happy and secure in the knowledge that you’ve got the fastest budget card out right now – period.

Bang ‘fer ‘yer Buck
Win: Foxconn 9600GT Nearly-win: Elitegroup 8800GT
Apart from a Fallout 3-induced momentary lapse of correct Australian journalistic accent, this category will give you the highest amount of 3DMark06 points for each dollar you spend. Essentially, you’re going to be getting the best increase in performance for your hard-earned – and that is definitely a good thing. Keep in mind that while this won’t necessarily give you the highest performance, however.

The card of choice in this category is the Foxconn 9600GT. Giving you 73.63 3DMark06 points for every dollar you spend, there really isn’t another card that is as good value, making this one an excellent choice. And not only that, but it’s also a decent card for gaming too, and perfect for a LANning rig.


Best Overall Value
Win: Elitegroup 8800GT Nearly-win: Foxconn 9600GT
Our last category is Value. This isn’t quite the same as getting the best performance, nor is it the same as bang for your buck, but rather the amount of awesome stuff you get for the cash outlaid. We’ve picked the Elitegroup 8800GT, because you get the second-highest performance AND bang for your buck, AND you get a very good game included – all for only $175. You really can’t beat this amount of value, and if we were to recommend any of these cards on an overall weighting, this would definitely be the one to pick.

Through all of our benching, testing, calculating, plotting, scheming and dreaming, we’ve pretty quantitatively shown that the lower end cards are really not worth considering if you call yourself an enthusiast. Depending on your needs, there’s going to be something here for you – and if you want to kick it up a notch in performance, make sure you check out the upcoming issues of Atomic for all the latest and greatest graphics reviews – there’s some exciting cards on the horizon.

 
« 
 
This article appeared in the January 09 issue of Atomic.

Aliens: Colonial Marines in depth; Z-77 Motherboard round-up; strategy gaming special; Home Server tutorial. PLUS MUCH MORE - ON SALE NOW!
5 Comments
cleadge
Feb 18, 2009 6:31 PM
i think thar is a typo in the first chart "3dMark06 points per dollar - [b]lower[/b] is better."
azn_warez
Feb 18, 2009 9:05 PM
I thought the HD4850 can be had for $240 right?
heydude
Feb 19, 2009 11:36 AM
No mention of power requirements???

The ati 4670 does not even need any external power connector and pulls those frame rates, pretty impressive.
And the card can run on a crappy psu.
Not to mention its stellar power reduction in windows,
it drops to 165mhz gpu clock and 250mhz mem clock in
windows dropping power requirements for a trully green
card that can game as well.

Well if I spent that much time on reviewing these cards
I think I would have mentioned that.

Not to mention that the his version comes with a brilliant
cooler that exhuasts the heat out the back of the case.
TheFrunj
Feb 20, 2009 11:06 AM
Hi heydude,

While we'd have certainly liked to have included power measurements for the budget-skewed angle, we actually didn't think of it at the time. However there is a handy thread on the forums that does list the power draw of those cards:
http://forums.atomicmpc.com.au/index.php?showtopic=264

*makes mental note to get power meter for next budget roundup*

-JR
heydude
Feb 20, 2009 12:57 PM
Thanks TheFrunj, I mentioned it because we always hear of how power efficient cpu's are, but in something like graphics that reasoning generally goes out the window for some strange reason. Must be frame rates, lol.

Cheers.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 137 | June, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop