Saturday November 21, 2009 9:42 PM AEST

Kid safe website brainwashes parents

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Kid safe website brainwashes parents
By The Inquirer
Jan 16, 2009 | 9 Comments
Tags: Kid | safe | website | brainwashes | parents

Back away from the X-box slowly and don't make eye contact... it may take on other forms!

Have you ever laid awake at night worrying about whether your child might be in severe danger because they caught the end of Terminator at a friend’s house? No neither have we, yet if you have you’d better hurry along to getgamesmart.com.

This delusional little website has been set up by an organisation which is clearly one of those 'wrap your kids in bubble wrap' kind of companies and god help any child who’s parents actually visit this site.

At first you may think, well at least it's thinking about our little dears and their 'media environment' and about three seconds later you realise that this website is nothing but a marketing scheme dressed up as a social responsibility.

And here's the kicker - guess who's behind the whole scheme. A quick surf of the site will quickly lead you to the realisation that the whole shebang is heavily centred on use of the Xbox and Windows gaming. That's right... it's all down to Microsoft (although they do list a number of of other 'partners'). Get 'em while they're young folks!

The first thing the website asks you to do is sign a PACT which will outline what your child should do and why. You are then asked to, “Keep it handy in a drawer. Stick it to the fridge or near the TV,” so that you can thrust it in their face if you find them playing when they shouldn’t be.

PACT of course is an acronym of Parental control, Access, Content and Time - just to make it sound a little less like a cult.

Next on the list is to take a family 'Pledge' to let the child know about what kind of media content is acceptable, the limit of how long they can play, sort out parental controls and online safety, talk about what images are acceptable on the computer and lastly, play together.

We hope it’s not just us that find this all a little bizarre, as it really does seem more like joining a sect rather than getting advice on safety measures.

The website goes on, with rules and regulations for every aspect of anything media related. The craziest one we could find was the rules around time, as it suggests - in accordance with The American Academy of Pediatrics - that children should have no longer than two hours of screen time a day. That’s all kinds of media combined.

If their parents want to read through all the guidelines on getgamesmart.com they will have taken up their entire quota on this one thing - no Grey's Anatomy for you tonight, Mum.

Although it is clear to see that the inspiration for this website came from a good place, the power seems to have overtaken the creator as a simple idea becomes an absolute insanity.

For example, keeping with the time section, not only does it suggest setting a time limit for the kids it suggests creating an actual "screen time tracker", even giving a link to one to download and then reinforcing this with a kitchen timer next to the Xbox – why not just get a big gong and crash it every ten minutes?

All this may seem strange enough, but the final icing on the cake for was the vomit inducing pictures and videos of smug happy family scenarios which parents who had found this scheme successful had sent in.

We’ve had to log off the web page now, before we get brainwashed ourselves – but go ahead and try it if you think you’re maleable enough to fall for it.

 

theinquirer.net (c) 2009 Incisive Media

 
The latest issue is on sale now!

Want to learn all about Diablo III? Want to find out what the best Solid State Drive is on the market today, and how to look after it? Want to catch up on the latest hardware, games and in depth tech from Australia's best enthusiast mag?

Get your copy today :)
9 Comments
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Mademan
Jan 16, 2009 11:08 AM
I think it's an excellent initiative, largely because these are the sorts of ground rules that were laid down in my house when I was younger. Inevitably they failed within a week, although there were attempts by mother to bring them back every now and then, much like Stargate re-runs. It's these sorts of conflicts that are essential in families, allowing people to find where they stand with each other. The content one is particularly important. I remember having movies censored so severely, Batman for me was the opening credits, a cape flying through the air, roll end credits. I was barred from watching the Terminator also. Which meant I had to download it instead. It was also laid down to me that pornography is degrading to women, which probably explains my sexual attraction to men.
n00bz0r
Jan 16, 2009 11:38 AM
I don't get this article. If you look at the website for more than 5 minutes you will plainly see that it's not a bad site. Even geeks hate preach a fair bit. Maybe the PACT thing could be a little extreme but then it's just a tool for parents to lay down some house rules for games and media. Every good parent ought to have some control over child's intake of information. Just let parents be parents.

My mother had rules when i was growing up with game and movie content. She wasn't all that strict she just didn't want me getting scared or feeling sick or whatever because graphic content of a movie (more particularly movies). Some things are hard to stomach for kids.
Hawkeye
Jan 16, 2009 11:45 AM
You know, it's odd - I can't remember any real restrictions on what I could and couldn't watch. Some of my earliest TV memories are things like westerns, war movies and even the Dirty Harry films. Censorship, detailed lists and times and such, just never happened in our house.

So perhaps that's why I really grok the direction of this article.

- DH
t8y
Jan 16, 2009 3:23 PM
so, we all criticise the government for its censorship and controls (existing or proposed..), with most of us saying "what ever happened to letting the parents decide whats best for their own children", and yet you guys are bagging one of the options that such a parent would use.

i know which id prefer;
id take (inspiration from) these kinds of flexible "DIY" control measures over the universal safety blanket the government forces on us any day

however, im not the "ned flanders" type of parent, so my daughter can express her free will to watch/play whatever she likes, much like i did when i was growing up
ahsoka
Jan 16, 2009 4:27 PM
Remember when therootofallevil.com redirected to Microsoft? That was funny. It redirects to Ebay now...anyway I think it should redirect to that site (not surprising considering that Microsoft is to blame for it).

As to restrictions etc: I'm with you Hawkeye, after all I've been watching South Park since it first started (I was about 3 at the time). I also had a much later bed time than most small children (something like 10:30 or something compared to something like 7:00.) I also got up later - what's with people watching TV in the morning anyway? - than other children. That might explain why I'm such a night owl.
And when it comes to censorship, I think people are smart enough to work out what they do and don't want to play/watch/listen to/etc. without the government telling them.

I went to the site, and I left instantly due to it's awfulness.

ahsoka out
strifus
Jan 16, 2009 6:19 PM
I have to agree with t8y, its probably the best solution I've seen in which there is an initiative to get parents involved in looking after their children especially when games are involved. All too often we read/watch reports on parents complaining about violent content in games/media. Like DH there, I dont remember many restrictions placed on me about what I could watch/play or not watch/play. About the only thing was being a good son and get good grades at school.

These days parents complain about the tiniest little thing and fail to realise that they had that child/children and for better or for worse they are responsible for the health and wellbeing of that child/children. I am not doubting that parenting in this day and age is a lot tougher, due to both parents generally working but like most things, there has to be a solution/compromise.

When the current government was campaigning during the previous election, I was quite impressed with its policies with regard to communications, ie Broadband. Imgaine my dismay when I hear/read that the Hon Senator Conroy is pushing, with the blessing of the current government, what amounts to censorship. Of course, one can say that its for the greater good but it only takes a small change for it to become the type of net China has, where your news and information is filtered by the government.

So, I say "Yay" to MS for this. I say its high time that parents take responsibility. It is not the scope of the government to protect your children. Its yours, ie parents. I support any endeavour where parent are given the tools, finally, to do what they should be doing in the first place as parents.

PS: Sorry for the rant.
Kastoli
Jan 16, 2009 11:05 PM
May i just take time to say, the overall "reason" behind this website is not at all pointless but any child and parent that finds a game they both like, and will spend as much time on togeather as i do playing CSS can send me a copy because i've yet to find one.
fliptopia
Jan 18, 2009 10:55 PM
Like most things in life I think it can be taken as a guide line for people who want an idea on what to do. This is not an enforcement like the net filter, these are a set of house rules and like all house rules you make them work for your house.
ENFUSIA
Jan 19, 2009 5:26 PM
This is the way it should be. Parents taking on the responsibility of placing the ground rules for the use and privilege of these items.

Now why can't the government take on this initiative and help to educate parents and families and show support for parents and families using these basic methods of control. Instead of taking away everyones rights by filtering the Internet and controlling what we can and can't access.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 
 
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 107 | December, 2009

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
"Yeay! :D It's good to see someone with their head screwed on properly."
by colganaitor | Nov 21, 2009 7:20 PM
 
"Holy shit, batman.

*runs"
by colganaitor | Nov 21, 2009 7:17 PM
 
""sudo preupgrade"
...failed to download installer metadata
------------
So ..."
by wlayton27 | Nov 21, 2009 8:16 AM
 
"I thought Vista outlived it's usefulness about the same time it was released , lol"
by mr.gargoyle | Nov 21, 2009 12:28 AM
 
"^ I find with CoD4 that I can jump on an empty server and be joined by 6-12 others before the ..."
by Ezekill | Nov 20, 2009 10:10 PM
Latest User Reviews
Shenmue II
10%
asdfasdf
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
great board, a few things could be better
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
Gorgeous looking
 
Sapphire 4890
90%
So good, I immediately wanted a second one!
 
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
90%
Allmost the prefect gaming board