Sunday November 22, 2009 7:01 AM AEST

NVIDIA blacklisting - Bit-Tech got it too

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
NVIDIA blacklisting - Bit-Tech got it too
By Justin Robinson
Mar 5, 2009 | 9 Comments
Tags: NVIDIA | GTS250 | blacklisting

This is just getting silly now...

We posted a story yesterday on how the big tech site Anandtech was given no information or samples of the GTS250 card by NVIDIA until well after other sites got their reviews up and guess what?

Now Bit-Tech has been given the exact same treatment.

NVIDIA refused to tell them anything about the card, refused to give them samples and even pressured the vendors into preventing samples getting to them!

One partner, who wished to remain nameless said "[we are] absolutely strictly forbidden to send samples out until the launch date.... it's rubbish!" Another said it was instructed by Nvidia to send samples to specific websites which, the partner admitted, it had never even heard of.

We've certainly noticed this too - smaller sites have got their reviews up already, but the large ones are only just getting them up now. Even Hardtecs4u have a sample - where Bit-Tech didn't. Surely NVIDIA would have wanted as much exposure for the new card as possible?

It seems that unless sites are willing to sing unending praise for what is essentially the 9800GTX+, (right down to core clocks, memory clocks and even PCB length for the 512MB version) that they aren't going to be getting a sample straight away, and that's downright wrong.

NVIDIA have said that the relationship with those sites is as strong as ever, but this quote shows that Bit-Tech believe otherwise:

We asked the same question when speaking to partners all week and they said exactly the same thing, which means that someone, somewhere, is getting in the way of the sampling process. The question is: why would the partners lie to us? They have no reason to because our relationship has always been tight and they've been up front when they have sample allocation issues.

We're getting pretty unhappy with this issue. It's not just that NVIDIA renamed a card in the hopes of increasing sales (misleading people into thinking it had a GT200 core, not the G92 that it actually has), it's that they've purposefully kept the big players from getting their own say out there.

Head over to Bit-Tech to read their blog post on this, and they've an amusing picture of a 9800GTX+ with a white-outed "GTS 250" drawn on it there too.

 

 
 
The latest issue is on sale now!

Want to learn all about Diablo III? Want to find out what the best Solid State Drive is on the market today, and how to look after it? Want to catch up on the latest hardware, games and in depth tech from Australia's best enthusiast mag?

Get your copy today :)
9 Comments
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Devit
Mar 5, 2009 1:51 PM
nvidia are on crack again
ahsoka
Mar 5, 2009 1:54 PM
Devit: +1
nesquick
Mar 5, 2009 2:48 PM
I dare say it will be another few weeks before we know the full extent of what reviewers where not allowed samples.
Hawkeye
Mar 5, 2009 2:54 PM
Yeah, we've fired off a few emails of our own regarding this to see if we've also been part of the list - certainly, we've not received anything.

- DH
Dasa
Mar 5, 2009 6:10 PM
i dont see what the big deal is if they want to review it all they need is a 8800gt or 9800gt and claim they reviewed gts250
i wonder how sick reviewers are of retesting the same card over and over i guess at least the scores will have changed a little with newer drivers
Mordecai
Mar 5, 2009 8:25 PM
I did notice a small typo in the bit-tech article ..

"While we wait for our card to arrive, we're going to be playing with our GeForce GTS 250 TipeXXX Edition... It's wicked fast."

Shouldn't it be "tripe"?
TheFrunj
Mar 5, 2009 9:19 PM
Mordecai - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipp-Ex

-JR
2SHY
Mar 6, 2009 10:23 AM
Nvidia's marketing department needs to be fired quickly. This behaviour is really silly.
KSB
Mar 8, 2009 1:56 PM
Oh cool! I can now claim I have the latest technology before it was released. a GTS250... instead of my outdated 9800GTX+
Login or register to submit a comment.
 
 
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 107 | December, 2009

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
"happy morning to you all. decided to make use of my optus off-peak usage and watch the HD ..."
by SlickGrunt | Nov 22, 2009 5:48 AM
 
"Signed"
by Vanoyen | Nov 22, 2009 3:32 AM
 
"I got an XP pro oem with a game build rig 18 months ago and continued to ignore Vista, to my ..."
by TonyB | Nov 21, 2009 10:24 PM
 
"Holy shit, batman.

*runs"
by colganaitor | Nov 21, 2009 7:17 PM
 
""sudo preupgrade"
...failed to download installer metadata
------------
So ..."
by wlayton27 | Nov 21, 2009 8:16 AM
Latest User Reviews
Shenmue II
10%
asdfasdf
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
great board, a few things could be better
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
Gorgeous looking
 
Sapphire 4890
90%
So good, I immediately wanted a second one!
 
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
90%
Allmost the prefect gaming board