Saturday February 11, 2012 7:43 AM AEST

Wolfram|Alpha - an Atomic look

By Justin Robinson
10:52 May 21, 2009 | 11 Comments
Tags: Wolfram | Alpha | Wolfram|Alpha | search | engine
«  »
Wolfram|Alpha - an Atomic look

Search and Computational Engine

Visually Wolfram|Alpha hits every mark it's supposed to, presenting a clean and professional looking interface with an easily accessible search bar with one noticeable difference - in place of a "search" button it has an equals button instead. There's a handy little box to one side with a list of examples to try, and a video for those who still don't get what it's all about.

Once you access the search box, typing in keywords is just the same as you'd expect for any search engine. You can search for mathematical equations, actor names, movies, songs or words, each coming with a series of boxes underneath with a lot of information about the topic you've chosen.

For an incredibly specific and exact search term this works incredibly well, pulling up plenty of information when we searched for "pi" including the value, series representations and examples of how pi can be used. This is presented in an easily digestable way for those unfamiliar with mathematics, but for the professional community this is aimed at we're not sure just how useful it'll be.

Next we tried an element, going with "Uranium", which brought up the periodic table location, element properties (including half life, boiling point, and valency), as well as a box of related links that appears next to the results, a very nice inclusion. This is all information you can find through Google, but it's presented in a neat way that will save buttloads of time for Physics and Chemistry students.

When we tried "Hugh Jackman" it brought up his name, date of birth and place of birth - but all this information is identical to the wikipedia page. It's the same for every single actor in the search engine, giving only three small chunks of info that is next to useless for any real purpose.

Unfortunately once you start moving away from the specific search terms, it becomes a little harder to get the information you want. It has no idea what we were asking when we inserted "Graphics card", "CPU" (bringing up a county in america instead) or "Video Games".

This is pulled up slightly by the more amusing searches you can do with the engine, such as "How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?" - giving  a response of "a woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood", very amusing and correct.

Not all is good with the service, so click on to see what isn't.

 

 
«  »
 
Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
11 Comments
sirsquidness
May 21, 2009 12:25 PM
I think you're looking at it from the wrong angle.

It was never meant to be a Google replacement. They do completely different things. Thus, not being a google replacement is not something to give it a thumbs down over.

Google is designed to find relevant pages. WA calculates stuff.

Putting in "CPU" in to WA leaves it nothing to compute. Perhaps a list of acronym expansions or a dictionary definition would be useful.

But try the following on google or any other search enging, and you'll see why Wolfram alpha is actually a fantastic site.
"Holman". It's my last name. I search for it on google, very little useful stuff comes up. Some US dude with a PHD. etc. I put it in [url=http://www30.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=holman]WA[/url] and BAM. Look at those lovely statistics!

Or say I'm stuck with maths.

[url=http://www30.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+2(sqrt(1%2F4-x^2))]BAM.[/url]. WA pulls up graphs, steps in how to calculate it (if you click the show steps button), series expansions and alternate forms (and more, depending on what you're doing).

Put in a city. You're just curious about something. [url=http://www30.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sydney]Sydney's current temp is roughly 19C, 56% relative humidty, 10m/s wind and mildly overcast.[/url]. I bet Google can't do that.

As they say, it's aim is to be able to compute anything that's systematically computable. Acronyms and static values (such as pi) aren't really anything computable.

It may be a bit slow at the moment, but keep in mind it's only in alpha, and they'll still be experiencing the initial wave of users (at least you don't get the "Server load exceeded" messages from HAL most of the time, now).

WA really is a fantastic invention, and really shouldn't be compared to any other typical search engine.
Hawkeye
May 21, 2009 12:33 PM
Sadly, WA has not idea what to do with my surname.

*sadfayce*
TheFrunj
May 21, 2009 12:34 PM
I mentioned that it was fantastic (not using the same word, mind) for the uses it was intended for, just not for everyone under the sun :)

For specific purposes it's the best thing since self-slicing bread.

-JR
daleyboy79
May 21, 2009 1:37 PM
It cant tell me the colour of a 2 cent piece :(
Athiril
May 21, 2009 2:14 PM
Ask it what the meaning of life is and you get 42 ;O
sirsquidness
May 21, 2009 4:19 PM
Hawkeye: And it thinks my home town suddenly had 20,000 people killed. (Quite old data, I believe)

It doesn't yet know everything. But it's working on it. (Just wait until it comes to know everything about your family, Hawkeye. Just you wait... but atleast then you'll be able to search for it on there =D )
Hawkeye
May 21, 2009 5:11 PM
Great. Skynet's about to learn where my fracking family lives. Great.
drago13666
May 21, 2009 8:40 PM
Challenge, without the aid of a calculater, use one search to find which is better value, a 7 oz bottle of purfume for $80 US, or a 120ml bottle for $70 AUD.

Google cant do that.
With W|A all you need is "80 US$ per 7 floz to A$ per ml"

What about finding how much AU it would cost for ten metres of cable when you are buying it from an English wholesaler in increments of 5 feet.

Can google tell me that?



10 US$ per 40 feet to A$ per meter
AIMBOT
May 22, 2009 9:28 AM
Having used Mathematica for work, W|A feels like a simple Mathematica web interface with a different set of features that it gains from being web based.
Sorceror
May 22, 2009 1:18 PM
I agree with sirsquidness, this review entirely misses the point of what Wolfram Alpha is for. It's a computation engine, just browse through all the example computations you can do. Think about it as Google's built-in calculator, but on steroids.

I'd also like to point out that they manually curate all the data they put into it, so while some data might be sourced from Wikipedia, it's not scraped automatically and does get checked over to some extent.
smadge1
May 22, 2009 2:05 PM
it won't tell me how many giraffes are kept in zoos or in captivity. I don't see the point of it really. It does show some nice network diagrams when searching for two types of animals.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Latest Competitions
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 133 | February, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop
 
 
Close Get the February, 2012 issue of Atomic mailed to you for $8.95, including postage.

Buy nowDigital Version