Saturday November 21, 2009 6:27 PM AEST

Command & Conquer 4 drops LAN play

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Command & Conquer 4 drops LAN play
By Justin Robinson
Jul 15, 2009 | 24 Comments
Tags: Command | and | & | Conquer | 4 | Starcraft | 2 | drops | drop | LAN | play | lanning

Essential Linkage: LAN play excluded from Command & Conquer 4, StarCraft 2.

Most of us have experienced the buzz and thrill of bringing a roomful of like-minded gamers together with their trusty custom-built-and-modded cases to play games for hours at a time, but for the future it's looking like something we won't have for much longer.

LAN play, or the art of connecting computers to a Local Area Network to frag each other, has been a staple of PC gaming ever since the original Doom game was released in 1993, and definitely one of the best ways to experience multiplayer. However the devs behind Command & Conquer 4 seem to be ignoring this long-held tradition, removing local play and making the player sign in to an online service - even to play the singleplayer component of the game.

While this must make sense to someone in the accounts department (after all they get to monitor every bought copy of the game), it's a huge oversight to completely remove something that would in fact help drive sales of the game. Many people pick up games that they played at a LAN and had a blast with, but with internet connections often being an afterthought if included at all, the restrictive online logging in system would mean that LAN play would be difficult - if not impossible.

Electronic Arts are adding in a class-based tracking levelling system, and a ranking for even the singleplayer campaign that needs to be followed by their stats servers, but this is an offensively powerful strike at the heart of traditional PC gamers everywhere. Sure every single kill you make, unit you produce and match you win in the game ever will be recorded, but what's the use if you can't even play the game you paid for without also paying for the internet? MMOs such as City of Heroes obviously need it, but why does singleplayer require it?

This is painful news to hear, since even Blizzard have crippled their LAN play and restricted players to an online-only Battle.Net experience. If both Command & Conquer 4 and Starcraft 2 remove support, two of the biggest RTS franchises out there, will this cause all other titles to follow suit? Will it eventually mean that you can't even buy a FPS like Crysis and play it without the Internet?

There are too many questions at this stage to definitively answer the whole issue, but Atomic isn't glad to see this popular pastime disappear - and we're definitely not alone. Head over to the petition to Blizzard to put LAN play back in Starcraft 2 (at time of writing 62,702 signatures had been added) if you're of the mind to sign, but hope seems dim at this point.

 

 
 
The latest issue is on sale now!

Want to learn all about Diablo III? Want to find out what the best Solid State Drive is on the market today, and how to look after it? Want to catch up on the latest hardware, games and in depth tech from Australia's best enthusiast mag?

Get your copy today :)
24 Comments
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
A Hitman
Jul 15, 2009 11:32 AM
C&C sucks anyway.
Too many games need internet connection to play single player, and with my internet being rather dodgy where I live doesn't help.
GhostFaceKilla
Jul 15, 2009 11:38 AM
Time to vote as a consumer.

I will not be getting C+C 4.

I will not be getting Starcraft 2.

I will not Purchase any game that requires me to stay connecetd to the internet to play single player.

If this means that ultimatley there are no games for me to play then so be it.

Take a stand and send a message peeps.
bastard
Jul 15, 2009 11:46 AM
I'm not a fan of RTS games at all and these days I am more of a console player, but to remove the feature that gives the best mutliplayer experience possible is just *cking stupid.

LAN parties are one of the industry ways of justifying that playing computer games is a social experience. EA are notorious for gimping LAN play even when the Burnout games were released.

I'd love to say vote with your wallets people but sadly, the games are good and I don't think that many people will not buy it :(
elvenwhore
Jul 15, 2009 1:08 PM
Wow, damn. We fired up C&C3 just this weekend for some LAN action. One of my primary motivators for purchasing games in the C&C franchise has been the LAN-based gaming. It's the kind of gameplay that has kept me playing these games long after release. Really sorry to hear this news.

And SP/standalone games requiring an Internet connection to play are a pet annoyance of mine. Double blow.

Early days, but still disappointing to hear.
Rion
Jul 15, 2009 1:18 PM
I am rather disappointed in hearing this already at this stage. I can understand the reasoning in being able to controlthe product better but at the cost of violating some game deisgn principles I and obviously others hold.

LAN play is something gamers I would imagine have never taken for granted as the LAN continues to be a staple of gameplay even with the advent of high speed internet connections and the still rocky road of game matching.

Early days at this point but I hope that it may be possible to reverse this decision if Starcraft 2 has enough backlash. Of course if it still eventuates it will be a very flat ending (for me) to a series I have loved so very much from its beginning.
orcone
Jul 15, 2009 1:56 PM
For every copy you people don't buy, I'll buy three!
Sparky
Jul 15, 2009 2:32 PM
Games are supposed to get better not worse. I wont be buying anything that is worse than it's predecessor.
DarkForceMage
Jul 15, 2009 3:08 PM
Won't removing lan just ENCOURAGE more people to NOT buy the game and download illegal copies /w cracked servers?

In my experience on the net, forums, real life friends etc. not many people will pay for a bad quality game or a game missing LAN for that matter. I remember back in the days of early PC gaming when a game didnt support LAN, lets just say not many people liked those games.
rhinocerer
Jul 15, 2009 4:34 PM
Probably. If you have to run illegal copy at lans for an "unofficial server", what are the options? Try to have two versions on you pc, or uninstall-reinstall before lan then same again after?

When you make pirating the easier option I think there could be problems.
TheFrunj
Jul 15, 2009 4:48 PM
I empathise with a lot of you, C&C on the PS1 was one of my first forays into this franchise (and I even played through RA2 about two times, then the expansion, then C&C3).

Do you reckon piracy will become more prevalent, coupled with an 'offline mode hack', so people can play for free without needing to connect to a server?

-JR
Tezlin
Jul 15, 2009 5:14 PM
TWO GAMES? TWO GAMES WITHOUT LAN? HOW SHALL I SURVIVE?

Honestly, I couldn't care less if C&C3 doesn't have LAN, but SC2 will need to have absolutely fucking fantastic gameplay to make up for all the people it loses through No-LAN.
Director
Jul 15, 2009 5:57 PM
Sign me up for not getting either as well.

Scum bags.
Lazzarus2nd
Jul 15, 2009 6:12 PM
Thats a stupid marketing move - I host a fair few LAN's at my house and whilst all players start with a cracked copy (COD4 in this case) they soon go out and buy it to play over the net, or for the continuity of thier 'player'.

Suffice to say experiencing the game at a LAN, then buying the game is a natural progression. Couldn't care less about C&C but SC2? Thats a diferent story.
fabricator
Jul 15, 2009 7:19 PM
Big surprise, I mean its not as if Red Alert 3 sucked as well, oh wait it does.

EA are morons, why are we still paying full price for 3/4 of a game ?
Pari
Jul 15, 2009 9:44 PM
Why are these people so stupid...how is it even possible to be so stupid as to remove lan from SC2 and CNC4.

I'm not supporting this lazy dumbfuckery anymore. Games come out half finished and they havethe nerve charge 120 bucks for a single game.

Yes, thats right im going to pirate from now on.

Suck my balls EA and any other company who follows suit.
Negotiator
Jul 15, 2009 9:57 PM
That is bullshit!!!!!

I love playing C&C but if this shit is happening then EA/Blizzard you can stick that idea up your arse. I'm not waisting my money unless I get LAN option to play with mates. Some WANKER big wig made this happen. F OFF!!!!
rhinocerer
Jul 15, 2009 9:59 PM
nice...
That is what they should call it.
C&C4: Tiberium Dumbfuckery.
bbjai
Jul 15, 2009 11:25 PM
death of alot of PC cafes around sydney then. They live off lan play
MagnumXY
Jul 15, 2009 11:59 PM
I don't care much for C&C and quite frankly I won't buy anything by EA but SC2 and Blizzard? For zergsake man you guys were voted best company by Atomic why don't you uphold that reputation?
Ashlar
Jul 16, 2009 9:05 AM
Idiots, both companies.

Of course it will lead to more piracy. Anything that can be engineered can be reverse engineered, its just a matter of time.

That said, I'll probably end up getting SC2 just because i still play the 1st one from time to time and loved the game so much -- but I certainly won't be buying CC4.


-A-
Arcerious
Jul 16, 2009 10:18 AM
This is a crazy idea. I quite often come back to play old games again years later. Does this mean that if they no longer maintain the login server that I wont be able to replay the game then?

As far as piracy goes again I don't think it will help them. Sure some people will feel they have to buy it to play the single player game but nearly EVERY LAN I go to has RTS games and not all have internet connections. Someone will create a 'server' that can be run locally on a LAN to get around this but it is an pain in the ass. It has been tried before (NFS:Underground 2 I think) and it failed there to.
ckalin
Jul 16, 2009 4:46 PM
i've never been good at RTS but i enjoy them. my fondest memories were playing warcraft dial-up to my cousins computer down the road and playing co-op on our <36.6k modems...
i may not have bought them before but this really was disappointing to read.
this is shooting themselves in the foot...

ckalin
Jul 16, 2009 4:50 PM
oh.. and i dont know about anybody else.. but do you guys feel insulted somehow by these actions? not saying i've always paid for every bit for data i've collected but... i dunno.. *shrug*
Argotha
Jul 18, 2009 5:27 PM
I hope that these guys learn a very hard lesson from this, a very hard financial lesson. Will not get C&C, may not get SC2.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 
 
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 107 | December, 2009

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
"The visit was useful. Content was really very informative. From www.globalsaridelivery.com"
by tanmoyrf | Nov 21, 2009 5:48 PM
 
""sudo preupgrade"
...failed to download installer metadata
------------
So ..."
by wlayton27 | Nov 21, 2009 8:16 AM
 
"I thought Vista outlived it's usefulness about the same time it was released , lol"
by mr.gargoyle | Nov 21, 2009 12:28 AM
 
"^ I find with CoD4 that I can jump on an empty server and be joined by 6-12 others before the ..."
by Ezekill | Nov 20, 2009 10:10 PM
 
"check

LOMAC
DCS Black Shark
X-plane"
by Bastard Child | Nov 20, 2009 8:13 PM
Latest User Reviews
Shenmue II
10%
asdfasdf
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
great board, a few things could be better
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
Gorgeous looking
 
Sapphire 4890
90%
So good, I immediately wanted a second one!
 
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
90%
Allmost the prefect gaming board