Friday February 10, 2012 4:29 PM AEST

Apple's Snow Leopard unleashed on Friday

By The Inquirer
09:19 Aug 25, 2009 | 11 Comments
Tags: apple | snow | leopard | osx | macintosh | operating | system | news
Apple's Snow Leopard unleashed on Friday

A slimmer, faster, simpler operating system.

It look like the speculation and rumours will finally come to an end as Apple has officially anounced the release date of the next iteration of its OS X operating system.

Snow Leopard will be available at the online Apple Store and Apple retailers from August 28th. The launch was heralded by the usual Apple tactic of shutting down its web portals for an hour or so this morning.

Available for pre-order from today, the £25 upgrade may not over-excite many Macolytes looking for major changes to the Unix-based OS X ('oh-ess-ten' for the uninitiated), as most of the new features are hidden at the operating system level. In fact, most users will be hard-pressed to tell the difference between Leopard and its Arctic-dwelling cousin.

Dig a little deeper, however, and you'll be rewarded with a raft of minor refinements, and one or two major ones, which might all add up to a worthwhile whole.

The most obvious change is that Snow Leopard will now support Microsoft Exchange Servers straight out of the box, no doubt syncing emails, contacts and calendars through updated versions of Apple's own proprietary software Mail, Ical and Address Book. It's difficult to be entirely sure how Exchange Support will be implemented as the 'Learn more about' link on the official website is borked. Perhaps they're not too sure themselves yet?

Snow Leopard will also include enhanced support for 64-bit systems with Apple announcing that all of its key system applications will have finally moved away from 32-bit only versions.

Grand Central Dispatch (GCD) is a new addition to the OS which dynamically scales the workload of an application to take better advantage of multi core processors. An application which doesn't use GCD could grab 20 processor threads when it starts up or is at maximum capacity, but will continue to hog those threads even if it's sitting around twiddling its digital thumbs. GCD will steal those threads back and give them to more deserving applications or system processes, theoretically making the whole system faster and more responsive.

In a similar manner, OpenCL, another new addition to Snow Leopard, will allow developers to tap into huge amounts of wasted processing power which sits around in your Macs graphics chips doing sod all most of the time. Again, most users probably won't have a clue that this is going on, especially as software developers have not yet taken advantage of the newly available processing power. If the Cupertino company plays its cards as close to its chest as is usually the case, we wouldn't expect to see OpenCL optimised applications for a good few months yet.

Apple's media playing jack-of-all-trades Quicktime also gets a tune-up with a new player, better support for more codecs and GPU-accelerated decoding of HD video.

As expected, Snow Leopard is the first Intel-only OS from Apple and PowerPC toting Mac fans will have no choice but to upgrade their hardware or wait and see how the Cupertino company continues to support their outdated machine architecture.

Apple's intention for the latest version of OS X has always been to refine the product rather than trying to reinvent the wheel. Apple reckons the entire OS has lost a massive 7GB of unsightly fat, and that something approaching 90 per cent of the underlying code as well as the user facing applications (more than a thousand individual projects) have been tweaked and improved.

Upgraders expecting new bells and whistles may be sorely dissapointed, but what has always been a stable and user friendly OS now looks to have finally come of age.

 

theinquirer.net (c) 2010 Incisive Media

 
Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
11 Comments
thesorehead
Aug 25, 2009 10:30 AM
^_^ they may be massive dicks sometimes, but you can't fault a $50 OS upgrade. MS is crazy for not copying this approach with their retail customers: one product (rather than four) + one low price = massive uptake of Windows 7.

*sigh**
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Aug 25, 2009 10:58 AM
thesorehead, Microsoft are a software company. Apple is a hardware company. They only reason they can sell the OS so cheap is because they make it back with the hardware. Microsoft can't do this.
Mademan
Aug 25, 2009 11:11 AM
well, it's not exactly cheap to create an OS, and Apple's aren't exactly cheap computers, so one could say that the cost of an Apple is just the parts and the OS added together, with a building and shipping fee slapped on top. So you don't exactly get the OS "cheaper" or "free" with Apple.

I agree with thesorehead though, particularly when "intention for the latest version...has always been to refine the product rather than trying to reinvent the wheel" is pretty much Windows 7 all over, yet Windows 7 has the pricetag of something with "bells and whistles". If OSX ran games natively, without the performance penalty of system emulation, I'd be running it right now.
MagnumXY
Aug 25, 2009 6:00 PM
Cyb3r Microsoft may just be a software company but they have three times the income of Apple I'm sure they could at least halve the prices of their OSes.
Paranoid_Android
Aug 25, 2009 8:04 PM
ahahahaha, Microsoft release OS upgrades like this all the time... they are called 'Service Packs' and cost absolutely nothing, stop your hating and pirate Windows already :P
hazarama
Aug 25, 2009 9:48 PM
Apple is rocking the upgrade party with Snow Leopard. Good things can only from this :)

Mudg3
Aug 25, 2009 11:42 PM
This can only end like the war in the middle east.
TinBane
Aug 26, 2009 7:48 AM
Paranoid: MS hasn't even back-ported DX10 to XP. They continue to carve up their market with a ridiculous number of SKUs which slug the end user based on the features they want.

Service packs tend to add stability and security, they tend to add bloat, not remove it. They certainly don't add openCL, GCD, or any of the other features apparently on offer here.

While Apple do make money from their hardware/software bundles, I think the big difference is they don't profiteer, only to squander their profits. Seriously, the development on Vista was a massive effort in expending too much resources to achieve far too little.
strifus
Aug 26, 2009 4:29 PM
I agree with TinBane's last statement. Vista was a massive effort on MS's part and for those who know, it was a bit of a frakkar from day one of developement only to see them scrap all they had done and start from scratch. I have said it before, Win 7 was what Vista shouldve been from the start.

That being said though, Mac OSs have always been a different kettle of fish till the advent of GUI on the PC platform. You cant really compare the two without looking into their past.

What i dont understand here is that most of you are comparing MS to Apple. They arent the same. Not even in the same ball park even if they share CPU architectures. The way I see it, this update does a lot for very little expenditure. WTF cares about how it compares to Vista/Win7.
Paranoid_Android
Aug 26, 2009 9:20 PM
TinBane: Your argument is invalid, since both apple and microsoft employ this technique in order to ensure consumers have a reason to upgrade to their latest OS.

Apple have not back-ported their equivalent to DX to more elderly versions of their OS, and further to this, they don't even have an equivalent.
With winXP microsoft updated DX9 many a time, so i wouldn't expect them to then provide one of the main selling points of Vista to their aging OS...

the difference between OSX and something like Win7, is that users are given the choice, rather than jobs mob deciding that feature x is what people want and ramming it down the throats of their misty eyed fanboys topped with a little bit of designer shine.

when i can buy a complete system from apple that has the same amount of power and performance that a linux/windows based pc provides, then maybe i'll think that a $29 US performance tweak is a good value thing, but until then apples profiteering from overpriced lemons will turn my nose every time.

TinBane
Aug 27, 2009 9:51 AM
Invalid? Do a bit of reading mate.
Generally, Apple releases a 'final' patch for superseded OSes, includes technology from their latest system back ported for compatibility. Obviously some technologies cannot or are not back ported, but in the main they are.

Apple has equivalents to directX. Ever heard of openGL? Oh, and funny, openGL updates are applied to 'outdates' os x updates relatively frequently. On top of that, features like core audio and core video (not to mention quartz) were all back-ported. Go read up the 10.3.9 notes.

In contrast, Vista added, in terms of real features, access control that should have existed in XP, and they removed directx driver access to ring 0 on the GPU hardware. /golf clap.

The disparity between features and cost for Vista's cheapest option vs the "ultimate" pack, was several hundreds of dollars. Enough to buy Leopard several times over. OH, and you can buy a 'family pack' of mac OSes for around thirty bucks more. As for ramming features down people's throats, I don't think I've ever seen someone complain that their windows is a non-crippled version that can network properly, but maybe that's a feature that irks some windows users. Personally, I like my OSes to be fully featured, without the vendor imposing seven or so arbitrary tiers of feature.

As for your last comment, I'm not going to bother. Why don't you do some reading, and stop making up excuses. If you think snow leopard is just a performance tweak, you need to get your eyes, or your reading comprehension skills checked.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Latest Competitions
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 133 | February, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop
 
 
Close Get the February, 2012 issue of Atomic mailed to you for $8.95, including postage.

SubscribeBuy nowDigital Version