Friday February 10, 2012 8:42 PM AEST

JJ Abrams and Roberto Orci talk Star Trek sequel

By Simon Brew
11:10 Sep 24, 2009 | 14 Comments
Tags: star | trek | paramount | scifi | movie | news
JJ Abrams and Roberto Orci talk Star Trek sequel

When can we expect the next Star Trek film, and just what kind of issues will it be dealing with? JJ Abrams and Roberto Orci have been talking...

On reflection, there was simply no blockbuster released this summer that came close to beating the two hours that JJ Abrams packed onto the screen with his Star Trek reboot. A massive critical and commercial success, it's seen the Star Trek franchise attracting the kind of mass appeal that Paramount Pictures surely hoped for when it greenlit the movie, but perhaps barely dreamed it'd get. And while some hardcore Star Trek fans had problems with the film, at the very worst there was an appreciation that JJ Abrams and his team hadn't forgotten them, as feared, when putting his reboot together.

Inevitably off the back of the film's staggering success, talk has turned to a sequel, which Paramount is understandably quite eager to get off the ground. Furthermore so, it seems, is Abrams himself. He's been dropping some hints as to which way he's likely to take the film in an interview he and screenwriter Roberto Orci (who, with Alex Kurtzman, wrote the reboot, and the pair are engaged - see what we did there? - to do the sequel too) gave to the Los Angeles Times.

First and foremost, the target release date for Star Trek 2/Star Trek 12 (choose which one you prefer) is going to be the same summer of 2011 that is already crammed to the rafters with big films.

Abrams said that "The ambition for a sequel to 'Star Trek' is to make a movie that's worthy of the audience and not just another movie, you know, just a second movie that feels tacked on." He continued: "It needs to tell a story that has connection to what is familiar and what is relevant. It also needs to tell it in a spectacular way .... There needs to be relevance, yes, and that doesn't mean it should be pretentious."

Meanwhile, Orci noted that they'd only had two meetings about the next film, and reiterated the desire to focus on contemporary themes. "We're trying to keep it as up-to-date and as reflective of what's going on today as possible. So that's one thing, to make it reflect the things that we are all dealing with today."

When pushed a little by the L.A. Times as to whether this would see a story dealing with a politically driven war with the Klingons, or a terrorist threat of sorts, Orci responded by saying,"Well yeah, those are the kind of issues we're talking about."

You can read the full piece, and further quotes from the pair, right here.

Also on the Star Trek sequel, Damon Lindelof, of Lost fame, has been added to the screenwriting team.

And on a separate, but not unrelated note, Patrick Stewart has ruled out the return of Jean-Luc Picard in anything other than a cameo role in a future Star Trek adventure. The actor told CNN, "I feel that I have left behind a legacy as Picard. In my head and heart, I've moved on."

 

Copyright © 2010 Den of Geek

 
Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
14 Comments
Taranthor
Sep 24, 2009 12:09 PM
Well I suppose he can't mangle the star trek universe anymore than he already has...

(I'm one of the people that had a problem with the first film, I can enjoy it as a film, but not as a star trek film) :P
Hawkeye
Sep 24, 2009 12:27 PM
I just can't talk to you.
Hoonbernator
Sep 24, 2009 12:43 PM
I'm not a trekkie, and I liked the film. Bring on the second one... (ever since the X-Men movies, I fear the 3rd movie most these days).
Negotiator
Sep 24, 2009 12:44 PM
I love the movie, at the movies on the big screen and on the TV at home. I've watched it a number of times already and I'm not even a Super Trekky
Taranthor
Sep 24, 2009 1:43 PM
*pokes hawkeye*

Hehe

I have a takoma taste in movies :P
ColonelSanders
Sep 24, 2009 2:37 PM
Wonder if Kirk will get a gurnesy in this one...I heard that Shatner wanted a bigger role in the first pic so they got Nimoy instead
codecreeper
Sep 24, 2009 7:12 PM
I still have not seen the first ST movie. Still waiting for the DVD release. You ever wonder why Dr.Who did not land on Federation vessel when he was on his merry way to Earth.
tantryl
Sep 24, 2009 9:13 PM
First ST flick was good.

It's hard to equate it to a regular ST flick. But they treated the concept of a reboot better than I imagined they could and in the tradition of the shows and movies - good ole time travel and alternate universe; without which it would have been a complete betrayal of the ST history.

And, of course, it's an action oriented high budget special effects film. Something ST has never previously been (the closest being Khan). Which changes it again.

Honestly, I like what they did with it. I go consider it entirely separate from the shows and I-X movies, but on the other hand it is a natural continuation in that fictional universe.

It's sort of like the difference between the original Spider-man comics and the Spider-man Ultimate series, or the traditional Punisher and the MAX Imprint. It creates it's own universe and flavour, without deleting the previous one.

I agree that it's not an ST film, but I can also agree that it absolutely is an ST film. It's weird.
SceptreCore
Sep 25, 2009 8:01 PM
The new Star Trek Reboot... was poo. And this sequel will be as well. And who is to blame? PARAMOUNT PICTURES.

Their problem is, they don't like having the Star Trek stigma. They hate it in fact. To them it's like a lame tattoo they had done in their teenage years, and now regret because it's with them forever.

So now they have decided to make it cool and trendy for the masses (masses of idiots). So that is why the Godfathers of Star Trek weren't invited to participate. But the dynamic duo Orci and Kurtzman who rite crap.... were invited to ruin mankind's greatest Science Fiction series.

Thank You Paramount Pictures. You suck by the way.
Doohan
Sep 27, 2009 3:05 PM
I have a fantastic new idea for the next Star Trek, it involves time travel...
seab4ss
Sep 29, 2009 3:32 PM
Its pretty simple; if you dont like it, then dont watch it!
Doohan
Sep 30, 2009 12:07 AM
You fool, you have to see the film first to decide if you like it, its not a re-run!
qwakqwak
Sep 30, 2009 9:46 AM
the latest star trek was great, however I wish they didn't mess with time travel so heavily...particularly as it set prior to most of the trek series
thesorehead
Sep 30, 2009 12:54 PM
They didn't really mess with time travel very much IMHO. They did just enough to connect the old Original Series with the reimagined universe, which I thought was a nice touch rather than just pretending Nimoy and Shattner age never existed.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Latest Competitions
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 133 | February, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop
 
 
Close Get the February, 2012 issue of Atomic mailed to you for $8.95, including postage.

SubscribeBuy nowDigital Version