Saturday November 21, 2009 11:58 AM AEST
Operating Systems

Windows 7 slower to boot than Vista

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Windows 7 slower to boot than Vista
Related Articles
By The Inquirer
Oct 9, 2009 | 25 Comments
Tags: Windows | 7 | slower | to | boot | than | Vista

Windows 7 taking a step backwards in speed?

Systems experts with stop watches have poured cold water on Microsoft's claims that its Windows 7 operating system boots up faster than Vista.

The Vole has been marketing Windows 7 on the claim that it can boot up quicker than Vista.

However according to Iolo Technologies, which flogs PC tune-up software called System Mechanic, Windows 7 takes a minute and 34 seconds to become usable, whereas Vista takes only a minute and 6 seconds.

This tallies with our experience with Windows 7 too. It can take a long time for network cards to activate and since you can't get onto the net straight away you still end up going and making a cup of coffee while the machine boots up.

Iolo said that most measurements were based on the time it took the desktop to appear. In Windows 7 this is much faster and can be about 40 seconds. However Windows 7 is not actually completely usable at that point.

It decided to trip its stop watches on the time it takes Windows 7 to become fully usable "with CPU cycles no longer significantly high and a true idle state achieved".

Windows still gets slower and slower as time goes on, apparently. Iolo found that a three-month-old machine can take up to a minute longer to boot, or 2 minutes and 34 seconds.

Windows 7 did outperform Vista at the three-month and six-month marks. But it "trailed the older version significantly" in its earlier boot-up tests.

Iolo plans to release more details on its findings and methodology next week.

 

 

theinquirer.net (c) 2009 Incisive Media
 
The latest issue is on sale now!

Want to learn all about Diablo III? Want to find out what the best Solid State Drive is on the market today, and how to look after it? Want to catch up on the latest hardware, games and in depth tech from Australia's best enthusiast mag?

Get your copy today :)
25 Comments
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
RaRaDawg
Oct 9, 2009 10:10 AM
 D:
And you see everybody yapping, "Windows 7 is what Vista should have been"
predator88
Oct 9, 2009 10:20 AM
 i have to disagree with this..windows 7 runs better on ym laptop then what xp did..its great.
Hubbo
Oct 9, 2009 10:21 AM
 Solution: Plug in a SSD, works wonders.
dudeman9
Oct 9, 2009 10:35 AM
 Maybe this idiodic mob should do their research first and actually find out why Windows 7 does this. Some people may note that when Vista first loads, it is completely unusable. Windows 7 PURPOSELY designed to be quick to the desktop, then take it's time loading everything slowly in the background so the computer remains usable while everything is still loading. People expect to start using their desktop the moment it appears, this is definately not possible on your run of the middle Vista machine. It's no miracle, but it does make booting into Windows 7 from cold boot a much more pleasant experience.
Jeruselem
Oct 9, 2009 10:38 AM
 Iolo Technologies can shove it's useless software and blatant marketing spin somewhere else.
Ravennoir
Oct 9, 2009 11:20 AM
 its just crap, Windows 7 is heaps faster than Vista
orcone
Oct 9, 2009 11:37 AM
 wendows seevn can go to hell
i am user
A Hitman
Oct 9, 2009 12:01 PM
 I honestly don't notice a difference in boot speed.
scruffy1
Oct 9, 2009 12:07 PM
 if you don't turn it off, then boot time is irrelevant

does the acronym s3 mean anything ?
Bloek105
Oct 9, 2009 12:47 PM
 Would have to agree with predator windows 7 has been fantastic on my gamer (few little problems with programs) and my laptop which previously disliked vista with a passion. Also agree with dudeman as im a tech and the ammount of people that come in and complain that there computer once loaded to the desktop is slow and like usual i have the frivaless task of telling them the same story over and over again.

orcone-"Wendows seevn" hmmm.........

Aussie Infidel
Oct 9, 2009 1:11 PM
 ive noticed a large improvement in boot speed over vista, even in opening folders and such its much quicker
Pari
Oct 9, 2009 1:51 PM
 Am I the only one who dosent give a fluff?

Seriously if you cant wait 1min for your pc to boot up then just keep it on all the time.

also this is BS anyway.
SlickGrunt
Oct 9, 2009 2:34 PM
 Yeah, Vista boots in to windows quicker - but it's still loading up and indexing, which makes it absolutely useless for another 2-5 minutes.

bah who cares? Windows 7 has already been recieving solid praise, which I can't say Vista ever had at the beginning. Just another bunch of brats wanting to make the geek headlines.
Mudg3
Oct 9, 2009 3:56 PM
 Its the inquirer what more can I say?
davidian
Oct 9, 2009 4:18 PM
 So they've done 3 month and six months tests? Sorry, when did 7 RTM? Well I personally find 7 more responsive...
Ezekill
Oct 9, 2009 5:26 PM
 I'm still naming my second born 'Seven'. Vista is up for adoption if anyone wants the stammering, incontinent little mongrel.
H3VIW8
Oct 9, 2009 6:22 PM
 in my limited experience 7 is way faster than vista. anyway tests are stupid, and everyone will be different. what you have hardware wise, what you have installed, what is in your startup list. plus really who cares.
sUpEr gEEk
Oct 9, 2009 9:33 PM
 Who cares about 20something secs? Its just 20something secs. It performs a hell of a lot better then "VISTA" and previous windows and is a lot faster then XP.
.:Cyb3rGlitch:.
Oct 9, 2009 11:31 PM
 Marketing stunt + silly journalists = news.

The circle completes.
philo-sofa
Oct 9, 2009 11:58 PM
 40 seconds to (wired) interwebs and so on fully available and CPU load @ or below 5% on my system (i7 860, 1600 MHZ CL7 & WD Black with Win 7 RTM). To be fair I have never had Vista on this latest system, but on my C2D system I remember even the RC1 being roughly this quick to boot and become usable, it was certainly no slower than Vista.

Would love to see testing by someone without a vested interest in Win 7 appearing slow.
cyber bonzai
Oct 10, 2009 4:56 AM
 hahaha, perhaps if they had the actual retail version of windows 7 then mabye they would be able to time it properly..... as a person fortunate enough to have it i can safely say on a good computer it boots up very quick and it can access the internet and load into a game in 40-50 seconds at the longest. This is far faster than vista.
Damo
Oct 11, 2009 6:46 PM
 Ultimately, Win7 will win the battle.
Spider-Man
Oct 12, 2009 11:18 AM
 i might have to test this myself on my rig. for the most part though i havent noticed a great deal of differance between the two atm, but vista is running off a RAID 0 array and is quite old, whereas 7 is off a sinlge 320GB hdd and its brand spankers.
though, i really dont care, vista works fine for me, as does 7.
sirtrancealot
Oct 12, 2009 11:52 AM
 I must also disagree, I have Win7 on 3 machines, my Sempron HTPC, my Core2 HP Laptop, and My 6000+ X2,

All 3 are much faster running win7, boot up, shut down, and general use. all using x64 of course!
hecktik_bro
Oct 12, 2009 4:56 PM
 Mate i've formatted my pc's thousands if not hundreds of thousands of times, i've got six laptops, and guess what? Sure maybe even if its possible a full loadup on vista might be faster on SOME SETUPS but using vista x64 bit on my desktop mate, it was absolutely positively rubbish. The day vista came out, two days later it was uninstalled and back onto xp 64 bit.. now windows 7 seems to be the next xp because its stable, has backward support for most programs and i think it is personally faster because of the design, but don't forget your comparing a beta against a fully tweaked version of vista.. so even if its true, just wait and windows 7 will pwn and then take a nice toilet urination on windows vista.

~~Love it~~ win 7
Login or register to submit a comment.
 
Area 53
 
Editor's Choice
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 107 | December, 2009

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
"Done.

.
..
..."
on Queensland takes on Atkinson!
by theflyingswan | Nov 21, 2009 10:41 AM
 
""sudo preupgrade"
...failed to download installer metadata
------------
So ..."
on Fedora 12 is released
by wlayton27 | Nov 21, 2009 8:16 AM
 
"I thought Vista outlived it's usefulness about the same time it was released , lol"
on Windows 7: Fastest selling OS ever
by mr.gargoyle | Nov 21, 2009 12:28 AM
 
"^ I find with CoD4 that I can jump on an empty server and be joined by 6-12 others before the ..."
on Modern Warfare 2 breaks records, and hearts
by Ezekill | Nov 20, 2009 10:10 PM
 
"check

LOMAC
DCS Black Shark
X-plane"
on Heroes over Europe
by Bastard Child | Nov 20, 2009 8:13 PM

Plan Finder

Powered by WhistleOut

1) Samsung S8000 Jet8 plans 50%
2) Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB35 plans 25%
3) Blackberry Curve 85206 plans 17%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 32GB35 plans 42%
5) Nokia E7147 plans 1%
Three iiNet Virgin Mobile Vodafone
« 1 of »
1) iiNet32 plans 7%
2) Netspace33 plans 42%
3) Optus47 plans 17%
4) Telstra BigPond41 plans 9%
5) Internode34 plans 9%

Compare: Mobiles | Broadband

Atomic MPC
Latest User Reviews
Shenmue II
10%
Shenmue II
asdfasdf
By jeffreybushii | Nov 13, 2009
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
EVGA X58 Classified
great board, a few things could be better
By -adicolor93- | Nov 2, 2009
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
EVGA X58 Classified
Gorgeous looking
By kramgref | Oct 29, 2009
 
Sapphire 4890
90%
Sapphire 4890
So good, I immediately wanted a second one!
By prof_skum | Sep 20, 2009
 
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
90%
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
Allmost the prefect gaming board
By George copley | Aug 28, 2009
 
more user reviews »