Saturday November 21, 2009 1:09 PM AEST

Intel caught with dodgy GPU drivers

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Intel caught with dodgy GPU drivers
By The Inquirer
Oct 14, 2009 | 7 Comments
Tags: Intel | dodgy | GPU | drivers | news

AMD points the finger at its old rival. Fight, fight, fight!

AMD has accused Intel of tinkering with its GPU drivers to increase its benchmark test scores.

Futuremark's popular 3DMark benchmark testing software has strict guidelines for the graphics drivers it approves for use with 3DMark Vantage.

These explicitly forbid optimisations that specifically target the 3DMark Vantage executable.

Basically the rules say that it is prohibited for the driver to detect the launch of the 3DMark Vantage executable and to alter, replace or override any quality parameters or parts of the benchmark workload based on the detection.

However AMD claims that Intel's 15.15.4.1872 Graphics Media Accelerator drivers for Windows 7 incorporate performance optimisations that specifically target the benchmark.

Tech Report did the decent thing and checked to see if there was anything dodgy going on with the Intel drivers in question.

It ran the benchmark normally and then renamed the 3DMark executable from "3DMarkVantage.exe" to "3DMarkVintage.exe" so the GPU driver software could not detect it by name.

When the GPU drivers were able to detect that benchmarking software was running the system's overal test score jumped by 37 per cent.

The GPU score by itself jumped by a whopping 46 per cent thanks to Intel's apparent 3DMark Vantage optimization. Interestingly the CPU score dropped by 10 per cent at the same time.

We reckon that between Intel and AMD, whichever one can figure out how to detect in a general way that the GPU is a bottleneck at the same time that the CPU is underworked, and vice-versa, and divert some of either workload to the currently underutilised resource will steal an important march on its competitor.

 

theinquirer.net (c) 2009 Incisive Media

 
The latest issue is on sale now!

Want to learn all about Diablo III? Want to find out what the best Solid State Drive is on the market today, and how to look after it? Want to catch up on the latest hardware, games and in depth tech from Australia's best enthusiast mag?

Get your copy today :)
7 Comments
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
iamthemaxx
Oct 14, 2009 10:32 AM
It's not like this hasn't happened before!
Mademan
Oct 14, 2009 10:41 AM
And it's not like ATi haven't done it before, although Nvidia are the usual culprit.

But lets be serious - a jump of 37% by an inbuilt "media accelerator". That may give smoother frame rates in solitare, does anyone take them seriously anyway?
Jeruselem
Oct 14, 2009 10:55 AM
Solitaire at 45fps is an achievement man! :D
Rage09
Oct 14, 2009 11:36 AM
Sounds like good design to me, but it should be for all the programs not just the benchmark ones.

I seem to remember 5+ years ago everyone was buying nVidia instead of ATI because nVidias drivers were a lot better. Kinda like having a V8 and a transmission from from a 2 stroke motorcycle, doesn't matter how much power the engine has if you can't use it.
thesorehead
Oct 14, 2009 12:14 PM
Rage09 - that would be great if they released optimisations for each and every game, video editor and CAD program. Of course they don't because the workload would be phenomenal, especially considering the constant patching of each of *those* programs.

This is why we have benchmarking utilities in the first place: so we can judge performance standards on a level playing field. If that playing field is tampered with, there is a problem and someone is at fault. It's one thing to have stable and flexible drivers, it's another to target an industry benchmark in an effort to skew results.
AIMBOT
Oct 14, 2009 3:41 PM
Um, it's pretty poor just checking the executable name. A better and more accurate method would be to look at the executable's header.
SlickGrunt
Oct 14, 2009 8:21 PM
Slap em around AMD, whoop their ass! You got em where you want em! :P lol
Login or register to submit a comment.
 
 
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 107 | December, 2009

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
"Done.

.
..
..."
by theflyingswan | Nov 21, 2009 10:41 AM
 
""sudo preupgrade"
...failed to download installer metadata
------------
So ..."
by wlayton27 | Nov 21, 2009 8:16 AM
 
"I thought Vista outlived it's usefulness about the same time it was released , lol"
by mr.gargoyle | Nov 21, 2009 12:28 AM
 
"^ I find with CoD4 that I can jump on an empty server and be joined by 6-12 others before the ..."
by Ezekill | Nov 20, 2009 10:10 PM
 
"check

LOMAC
DCS Black Shark
X-plane"
by Bastard Child | Nov 20, 2009 8:13 PM
Latest User Reviews
Shenmue II
10%
asdfasdf
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
great board, a few things could be better
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
Gorgeous looking
 
Sapphire 4890
90%
So good, I immediately wanted a second one!
 
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
90%
Allmost the prefect gaming board