Friday February 10, 2012 5:22 PM AEST

First SATA 3 performance impression; not much has changed yet

By Justin Robinson
15:51 Oct 27, 2009 | 13 Comments
Tags: SATA | 3 | 2 | SATA-II | SATA-III | ASUS | Seagate | Marvell | storage | SSD | HDD
First SATA 3 performance impression; not much has changed yet

SATA-III moves at an unchanged pace.

Since the introduction of the original SATA standard quite a few years ago, PC components have experienced huge increases in both ease of use (no fiddly master/slave headers) as well as performance increases when compared to IDE (133MB/s theoretical max vs. SATA II's 3Gbit/s).

With the recent release of both the ASUS P7P55D-E Premium motherboard, running a Marvell 88SE9123-NAA2 chip, and the Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB HDD, the time has finally come for SATA III. It boasts the same physical interface, the same cables and demands the same power envelope, so what has changed?

Apart from a sheer doubling of the speed to 6Gbit/s, SATA-III also offers a completely redesigned Native Command Queuing (NCQ) algorithm that manages the writing of data to the discs within. These are the only real changes to the standard, so we threw the Seagate Barracuda XT into the ASUS mobo to see what kind of performance gains we could eke out.

click to view full size image
Seagate SATA-II performance
click to view full size image
Seagate SATA-III performance

SATA Type SATA-II SATA-III
Random Access 16.6ms 16.5ms
Burst Speed 201.6MB/s 223.0MB/s
Average Read 120.0MB/s 118.8MB/s

As shown in the images above and summarised in the table, SATA-III brings a slightly faster Burst Speed with minutely reduced Random Access times. This set of results is close enough for the difference to be ruled out as standard variable performance, and they're practically identical.

click to view full size image
The Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB.

What this boils down to is that while SATA-III might be a technically faster and more capable standard, but until we get flash-based storage media such as SSDs becoming more mainstream there's no benefit in performance to our current-gen mechanical media.

Any performance difference in these large-capacity HDDs in the future will come mainly from the addition of smarter cache and higher data densities; placing the importance of SATA-III squarely on SSDs.

So for now you might see motherboard manufacturers listing SATA-III as an ultrapremium feature - and until SSDs catch up to the mainstream market, that's exactly where the feature will stay.

 

 
 
Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
13 Comments
iamthemaxx
Oct 27, 2009 4:28 PM
Don't you guys have an SSD you can test?
TheFrunj
Oct 27, 2009 4:30 PM
Not a SATA 3 one.
tunksy
Oct 27, 2009 5:09 PM
seriously what's taking manufactures so long, i want my new build nows!
box124
Oct 27, 2009 6:30 PM
patience my young padawan. :P
tny
Oct 27, 2009 9:37 PM
I just ordered a p6t deluxe V2 two days ago and was a bit upset to see the news about SATA3 and USB3 motherboards the day after.
So thanks for this article. It seems that I do not really need this features for now. Maybe some PCI express cards will be released later to add these features to older boards.
I am just wondering if a PCI express card will have the same performance as the on board chip if the chip also use PCI express bridge to connect to the x58/P55 chipset.
bom
Oct 27, 2009 11:51 PM
hey tny, to top it off PCIe 3.0 is also on the way.
tny
Oct 28, 2009 12:19 AM
@bom: Oh no! What should I do now?
...
It seems PCIe 3.0 may not arrive before 2011 so I'll definitely not wait for this one before upgrading ;-).
coparofl
Oct 28, 2009 9:38 AM
on the gigabyte website it says that when running sata 3 in raid config you get 4x the speed of sata 2

can you guys run a test with raid setup as well, pref raid thats striped.
iamthemaxx
Oct 28, 2009 9:41 AM
It'd still be interesting to see a test on any SSD.
mynameismatty
Oct 28, 2009 10:18 AM
copa: RAID0 will be 2* 6GB/s (6G) = 12Gb/s = 4 times faster than SATA 3G.

All theoretical of course.


mark84
Oct 28, 2009 1:13 PM
Yeah but in RAID the bottleneck becomes the controller, not the path between the controller and the discs.
qwakqwak
Oct 28, 2009 1:26 PM
SATA3 seems like a whole lot of nothing until we get decent SATA3 SSDs.

However USB 3.0 is a sh!t load quicker
12345
Oct 28, 2009 4:55 PM
USB3 Is taking forever to get on these boards.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Latest Competitions
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 133 | February, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop
 
 
Close Get the February, 2012 issue of Atomic mailed to you for $8.95, including postage.

SubscribeBuy nowDigital Version