Thursday May 24, 2012 6:23 PM AEST

Google guns for a superheroine

By The Inquirer
09:59 Jan 18, 2010 | 10 Comments
Tags: Google | guns | for | a | superheroine
«  »
Google guns for a superheroine

That Google chose to launch the service on April 1st 2004 really set the cat amongst the pigeons. Many commentators swore that offering the unwashed masses a free email service with unprecedentedly huge amounts of storage - in fact 1GB was about 100 times more than your average commercial email service offered at the time - with the added promise of no advertising banners, had to be a cruel joke.

There were even rumours flying that Gmail invites were changing hands on Ebay for up to $100 a pop.
Google's philanthropic kindness didn't stop there, however. The company was soon snapping at the heels of Microsoft's dominance in the workplace by offering a totally free web-based alternative to the software giant's all-powerful Office suite of applications.

Google Docs could do just about everything that Word, Excel and Powerpoint could do, in a cloud-based application, for absolutely nothing. Free. Buckshee. And the magnanimous megacorp would look after all of your data for you. Forever. Whether you wanted it to or not. Oh dear.

Someone once said "With great power comes great responsibility" - it was either Spiderman or Franklin D Roosevelt depending on how old you are - and Google has now amassed such massive power that it is wobbling at the edge of a great abyss. The Internet behemoth now generates so much wealth, employs so many people and touches so many lives that its original principle - to avoid doing evil - seems almost impossible to maintain.

Google's rise and rise is the stuff of fiction, and like all the best movie villains - the ones who were once good kind people but are turned by fate or circumstance to the dark side - Google is at a fork in the road. The money making machine has built such momentum that it will take more strength than any number of well-meaning board members have to keep it on the straight and narrow, the path of righteousness.

There are, however, chinks in its corporate armour. Google announced yesterday that it had uncovered the tracks of some very sophisticated hackers who had broken into its servers and weaselled about in the private data of some well known Chinese anti-government dissidents. The company stopped short of directly accusing the Chinese government, but the implication was crystal clear. Google will no longer kowtow to the demands of the oppressive communist regime by censoring web inquiries in China. And if the Chinese authorities don't like it, Google is prepared to shut up its Beijing shop, take its ball and go home. We can guess how this one's going to play out.

But the yin and yang must be balanced. For every act of political courage or corporate generosity there must, inevitably, be a kick in the teeth for someone.

And so we turn to the tale of another super hero, or heroine, and oppressive actions of a different kind.

It seems there's an online comic book called "I Am Googol". In the story, the leather-clad super heroine has an extraordinary brain that enables her to process more than one googol of data per second - which sounds a bit lame to us as super powers go, but she would be great at splitting the bill in a restaurant. The character's creator, Sylvaine Francis, says she was born when she found the word and its definition "completely at random" one day.

Sylvaine has some rather ambitious plans to turn "I Am Googol" into a movie but, without wishing to rain on her obvious enthusiasm for her creation, a ranking of 1,634th on the Webcomic list and 140 Facebook fans - including, for the purposes of research, your humble author - seem hardly likely to have James Cameron beating a path to her door.

 

 
«  »

theinquirer.net (c) 2010 Incisive Media

 
Aliens: Colonial Marines in depth; Z-77 Motherboard round-up; strategy gaming special; Home Server tutorial. PLUS MUCH MORE - ON SALE NOW!
10 Comments
flexx
Jan 18, 2010 11:49 AM
Why put this article up at all. Hardly an act on a Evil Corporation
Rage09
Jan 18, 2010 11:54 AM
The bigger the company the more people they pay to waste other peoples time on this kind of crap.

Would be hilarious if that dead mathematicians kids sued google for the use of the word thier grandfather coined.
Fat_Bodybuilder
Jan 18, 2010 1:21 PM
The reason google is better than any other search engine is because it doesn't have an entire website with a searchbar in the top corner. It's actually about the searching.
Mademan
Jan 18, 2010 1:26 PM
I like the angle this article takes, avoiding the cliche of how google could effectivly know every detail about you, by allowing you to use their document creation software, email services, GPS, operating system and/or phone, hence having access to all aspects of your digital life. Users simply trusting that Google and their 1000^2x amount of employees won't use the data for purposes you don't agree with, or give it to someone else. Don't be evil?
brumby92
Jan 19, 2010 1:05 PM
Don't be evil. Awesome motto. But i really couldn't care about Sylvaine or her character googol. Google can do what ever they want to protect its company
RaYdeX
Jan 20, 2010 9:24 AM
This is a pretty lame article. Nay, it's an exceptionally lame article.

It's the kind of thing I'd expect ACA or TT to come up with. Or the Inquirer for that matter, but really? This kind of crap isn't what Atomic's about...

Google are doing exactly what any other company would do in similar circumstances, and by the letter Google sent, they've gone about it quite politely...
NagChampa
Jan 20, 2010 10:40 PM
Unfortunately, a lot of the time it seems the lawyers don't care what the public think, if they think there's a reason to defend a copyright they will act. Some jurisdictions almost require it to protect the copyright. But I think some lawyers need to learn theres a point where they are going to reflect badly on the company...
Chaps
Jan 21, 2010 12:05 PM
First they came for the Domain Name owners but I didn't speak up as I didn't have a domain
then they came for the Search Data but I didn't speak up because I didn't have search
then they came for the Mail Accounts but I didn't speak up because I didn't have an account
then they came for my data... but there was noone left to speak for me
SquallStrife
Jan 21, 2010 5:06 PM
RaYdeX: Just in case you didn't see it down there, this is actually an Inquirer article. This kind of tripe is routine for them. One can only assume that Atomic uses some kind of automated process for syndicating this kind of stuff. Because you're right, it IS a lame article.
blackmancer
Jan 28, 2010 2:10 AM
I don't think its a lame article. It shows how some little thing like that, which in all honesty at best would cause very minor detraction from Google via sullied name or lossed trading..... copyright/patent laws at their bullshit best.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 137 | June, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop