A new Xbox LIVE Code of Conduct update opens the way for queer gamers.
A while back we tore some well-deserved strips off Microsoft over its policy regarding queer identification on its Xbox Live service. Back then, MS actually banned a user for identifying as a lesbian in her GamerTag, saying she was in breach of the terms of service. As of Friday, however, Microsoft's decided to let gamers come out of the closet, as announced via Xbox Live General Manager Marc Whitten.
Here's what he had to say:
" ... I'd like to announce an update to the Xbox LIVE Terms of Use and Code of Conduct which will allow our members to more freely express their race, nationality, religion and sexual orientation in Gamertags and profiles. Under our previous policy, some of these expressions of self-identification were not allowed in Gamertags or profiles to prevent the use of these terms as insults or slurs. However we have since heard feedback from our customers that while the spirit of this approach was genuine, it inadvertently excluded a part of our Xbox LIVE community."
Awesome-sauce, we say, and far remove from the double-speak of what MS last had to say on the subject: "In regards to sexual orientation, for gamertags or profiles we do not allow expression of any type of orientation, be that hetero or other. Players can, however, self identify in voice communication where context is more easily explained to all players involved."
Along with the update to the Terms of Use comes a commitment for more stringent policing of any abuses to the system. It looks like MS really is taking our old argument to heart, that you cannot have a truly inclusive social network of any kind if you're excluding a large portion of your audience.
This has, of course, been a long time coming - the original user-ban that sparked the controversy happened back in February of last year. However, what's important is that Microsoft has come around to a more open stance, and we applaud them for it. Gaming culture can be homophobic at the best of times - queer gamers don't need big companies legitimising that view.
Issue: 133 | February, 2012