Saturday February 4, 2012 7:55 PM AEST

Have your say on the Net Filter

By David Hollingworth
10:55 Jul 13, 2010 | 20 Comments
Tags: net | filter | censorship | senator | conroy | poll | news
Have your say on the Net Filter

Take part in an IT-media-wide poll and voice your support or opposition to the Labour Party's Net Filtering scheme.

There have been a mess of polls, campaigns and general protests against the ALP's Net Filter scheme, but there's never been a poll quite like this one.

This is a unique, cross-publication poll - hosted neutrally - aiming to get the opinions of arguably the most informed members of the public. It's already being pushed on raft of major IT publications, including news.com.au, SMH, ITWire, LifeHacker and the ABC (well, shortly, on the ABC, at least), and now it's Atomic's turn.

 
 
Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
20 Comments
Dogberry
Jul 13, 2010 11:08 AM
It might be more help if the article includes a link to the poll...
Hawkeye
Jul 13, 2010 11:14 AM
The poll should be in the body, actually. I can see it...
RaYdeX
Jul 13, 2010 11:33 AM
That's not exactly a good poll...

For 2 reasons that come to mind.

1. The Filter isn't the only thing I'm concerned about. And being that the Filter is such a godaweful mess, really it's not going to affect my life that much. I can get around it if I want to etc. So it's not the only thing affecting my vote.

2. We don't really know which political parties DO support it, besides Labor, and which actually don't. Do the Liberals support it? I really don't trust them to roll it back if they get into power if it's already come so far.

So I voted "No" on the poll, because that's the message I want to send. But really? Depending on many factors, I can definitely see that I could vote for a party that supported the filter.
iamthemaxx
Jul 13, 2010 12:01 PM
Jebus, talk about overly simplified.

It doesn't take into account what other policies a party might have.
Director
Jul 13, 2010 2:13 PM
Forget other policies, any party that wants to control my freedom to read what I want and talk to who I want is tyrannical by it's very actions and it's other policies would probably reflect that disposition as well, and if they didn't then they would be of no consequence anyway.
Hawkeye
Jul 13, 2010 2:28 PM
In which case, Maxx, you should answer yes - given that you're obviously willing to consider other policies as more important :)
SceptreCore
Jul 13, 2010 2:59 PM
Yeah maxx... it's not rocket surgery.
Argotha
Jul 13, 2010 3:29 PM
This is what we like to call. getting the message across to a bunch of people that just don't get it. you make it very obvious to them what you dont want
sm1ddy
Jul 13, 2010 4:43 PM
The filter is an awesome idea.
discoInferno
Jul 13, 2010 8:29 PM
That's a hell of a lot on No's to a small smattering of Yes's. I had to give it a Yes because there's just no way I can vote for a party lead but Tony Abbott, and Green's votes end up with the ALP anyway.

I hate the idea of a mandatory Net Filter as much as anyone, but were it to be voluntary I'd be right behind it. No one can argue that filtering child porn is a bad thing - perhaps not particularly effective - but not necessarily bad. It's the idea that "Government knows best" which I have a fundamental problem with.
alex8337
Jul 13, 2010 10:30 PM
fuck who cares if its over simplified, these political pricks need a 10k high sign lit with neons that can be seen from space to get the message that pissing 'anonymous' off, is a stupid thing to do.
Barbatus
Jul 14, 2010 9:25 AM
I don't support the Net Filter at all, but I would rather have Labour in power over the Liberals and Greens so I'm forced to vote for them Net Filter or not.
xtort
Jul 14, 2010 4:20 PM
bit of a crap poll but lets hope they get the message. still cant see how they think that a filter will stop child porn. you could block every possible site that contained that sort of stuff and the people who are interested in acquiring it will, and i dare say have found way's around it. unless the government of this country wants to decrypt and inspect all internet traffic (just a slight invasion of privacy!) then the idea should be tossed on the scrap bin. I personally don't want to have all my login info for my banking, email, steam, work etc intercepted and decrypted.
davidald
Jul 14, 2010 5:37 PM
Its got more to do with P2P, the child porn issue is to get public backing.
Splatterchops
Jul 14, 2010 5:42 PM
It's big brother on a monumental scale. Unacceptable for Australia or anywhere else that calls itself free! I will make zero difference to the number of children abused and is a smokescreen for their own agendas. Anyone who votes for Labor even aside from this is NUTS. Take a good look at the social and financial slide they directly have put this country on!
Splatterchops
Jul 14, 2010 5:43 PM
oops IT....I meant IT!
R430R
Jul 15, 2010 10:46 AM
It's pathetic that we're "free" and the word "governed" for some reason is oblivious to those in power that it is used in direct contradiction of the word "free" ....this is just one example of why we shouldn't limit what people do regardless...if we take away kiddy porn from the net...where will they go to get their porn? i'm not well versed in the logics of the mentality of a peadophile, but would that mean we have to keep our kids chained between the house and the playground, to know they're safe?
I don't actually have kids but plan too and thought it'd be a good point to make.
....HEY wouldn't it be great to get perhaps a genetic disease that makes all rock spiders impotent and computer illiterate...that'd definitely be a death sentence to me haha.
and as for P2P, they're pathetic, I hope they realise that apart from the child abuse, the internet filter will only help aussies get poorer and hollywood get richer
azamoth
Jul 16, 2010 10:31 PM
I had a massive arguement with a mate of mine because he was seriously stressing that they would filter Australia's internet. I told him and bet him that no such thing could ever exist.
Kastoli
Jul 18, 2010 8:32 PM
Wow, seriously? 690 people voted yes...
Kastoli
Jul 18, 2010 8:35 PM
Also... Barbatus, i'm in the same position. Hopefully they get the message though.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Latest Competitions
 
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 133 | February, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop
 
 
Close Get the February, 2012 issue of Atomic mailed to you for $8.95, including postage.

SubscribeBuy nowDigital Version