Friday May 25, 2012 1:00 AM AEST

Black Ops heading for a subscription model?!

By David Hollingworth
15:46 Oct 29, 2010 | 31 Comments
Tags: call | of | duty | black | ops | multiplayer | pc | console | multiplayer | gaming | news
Black Ops heading for a subscription model?!

Essential linkage: One industry analyst expects that Activision will move toward a subscription model for online play in Black Ops, Starcraft II - please, Gods... NO!

Feel like a real bummer of a Friday come down? Point your browser to this old article on the Industry Gamers site.

In it, Wedbush Morgan Securities analyst Michael Pachter makes the bold and frankly terrifying claim that with game sales plummeting, it's online and multiplayer gaming that's to blame. He posits that with so much of a game's lifespan originating from an effectively limitless amount of online play, gamers are buying less games.

Even worse, he has the following to say:

"We think that it is incumbent upon Activision, with the most popular multiplayer game, to take the first step to address monetization of multiplayer. It is too early to tell whether that will be a monthly subscription, tournament entry fees, microtransaction fees, or a combination of all three, but we expect to see the company take some action by year-end, when Call of Duty Black Ops launches."

To which we can only say... FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY, PLEASE NO.

We've already seen the monetisation of this space, in the shape of paid DLC. Many publishers, Activision being one of them, has made scads of cash from releasing new maps and game modes.

Of course, the above quote is taken from an article posted in June, so you might be forgiven for thinking that possibly Pachter has moved on from his belief, but Industry Gamer now reports he's saying that ahead of Activision Blizzard's upcoming earnings announcement that a further release on the move to monetise not only Black Ops, but also Blizzard's Starcraft II.

Here's what he told IG just recently:

"I truly think the biggest surprise [this holiday] will be the launch of a premium service offering multiplayer online gaming. The publishers all are looking at this, and I think one of them will be bold enough to announce such a service by year-end. I'll be surprised if the price is low, and equally surprised if gamers accept it without complaint."

Well, he's got that last bit right. 

If a truly premium service were on offer, one that was bug free, fast, and involved solid connections to local servers that were user configurable... it might be worth it. But what are the chances of that actually happening?

Never, in the history of analysis, have I so wanted an industry pundit to be so dreadfully and categorically wrong. But like all the best horror scenarios... it's just all to believable, isn't it? Sadly, Activision does not comment on rumour or speculation, so there's nothing definitive on that front either.

 
 
Aliens: Colonial Marines in depth; Z-77 Motherboard round-up; strategy gaming special; Home Server tutorial. PLUS MUCH MORE - ON SALE NOW!
31 Comments
Atosniper
Oct 29, 2010 4:15 PM
I dont have much of an opinion on the point of the article; it may or may not happen. Hopefully the latter.

However, Pachter is an idiot who almost never gets any calls correct...why MS keeps him employed is beyond me.
wraith676
Oct 29, 2010 4:57 PM
Saw it coming a mile away and just shook my head.... Its gonna happen sooner or later. Its unfortunate too....
mudjimba
Oct 29, 2010 6:05 PM
Dedicated servers, any other costs would be renting a game that you have already payed for.
wraith676
Oct 29, 2010 6:30 PM
Wow gets away with it?
Acintai
Oct 29, 2010 6:41 PM
Now I'm worried about diablo 3 again
Hawkeye
Oct 29, 2010 6:56 PM
WoW offers something on an entirely different scale.

A 32 player server you can host on GameArena is one thing - a global server that can host thousands of players in real time... that's another.
jdog
Oct 29, 2010 8:51 PM
i just hope this doesnt happen..i dont have the money to keep paying to play a multi-player game (even if i really like the game) thats why i dont play MMOs (that may change when the star wars MMO comes out)
wraith676
Oct 29, 2010 11:49 PM
Hawkeye my post was in regards to the pay for game + sub rather then the sub itself.
BlackshirtOgre
Oct 30, 2010 2:21 AM
This may not be bad news if there is not a huge market for it. It may allow other smaller developers to continue providing disc-based multiplayer without subs. If there is a market for subscription based games the bullet will have to be bit to play online. I still think that there are a significant number of economy gamers out there that will not tolerate the costs.
Larvan
Oct 30, 2010 4:54 AM
This is old news, it's already been said they won't be a subscription to play online, only will be a fee with certain things, but not all is subscription titled.
Twents
Oct 30, 2010 6:15 AM
hmm well... i spose id pay for a subscription service but only if i got 20 ping and then i would only pay in empty pizza boxes.
Ekythump
Oct 30, 2010 8:29 AM
i doubt to many people would pay a sub to play an FPS online when there are a bunch of other good ones out there to play for free. I Know i won't be.
Mademan
Oct 30, 2010 9:34 AM
Must be a slow news Friday if you're digging up articles from July...

Bundy 2.0
Oct 30, 2010 2:28 PM
Well this could damage their 'casual' player base, I'm a hardcore gamer clocking easily 30+hours a week gaming but not when it comes to FPS, I love FPS but I can't play it a lot I get bored fast so basically I play games like MWF casually like maybe once a weekend for a couple hours just to chill. If they moved to a payment plan they better make the client free (or very cheap) else I probably wouldn't touch it as the hours I put into it simply wont be worth the extra investment.

I will say this though I have followed listened and read a lot of Michael Pachter's stuff and he is wrong A LOT of the time. However I wouldn't put this past Activision.
GhostFaceKilla
Oct 30, 2010 2:52 PM

Greed has killed gaming. The visons it once dared to dream, the promises it once teased of its potentials for expression, the hope it nurtured about a universe without boundaries, a space where imagination was the supreme currency. It was inevitable really.

Last one out please turn off the lights.
wraith676
Oct 30, 2010 6:57 PM
lol GFK welcome to capitalism.
jdog
Oct 30, 2010 9:23 PM
orginally in games will be hard to find in the next few years...all the same year after year with pay for play multi-player,$20 5 map pack or other crappy DLC....im sorry to say but this looks like the future of games (well activision would like it that way..)
Zhaker
Oct 30, 2010 11:34 PM
So far, what people said about not getting the game because of BLAH, end up getting the game. Such as:

- Starcraft 2, no LAN support.
- Modern Warfare 2, some wierd LAN support and no mod support.
- L4D2, too early and L4D1 was incomplete.

If anything people would 'eventually' pay for this service.
wraith676
Oct 31, 2010 1:58 AM
Well i can guarantee you i'm not going to get black ops cause A) it looks shit. and B) I am poor and have better things to spend my money on.
SparrowFart
Oct 31, 2010 2:10 PM
You only bite the hand that feeds once!
mudjimba
Oct 31, 2010 3:53 PM
I'm keen to give it ago. It's that or medal of honor at the moment.
bnew
Nov 1, 2010 8:56 AM
It's stuff like this that makes me want to buy new release games less and less.

I still buy plenty of games, but they tend to be ones that are 3-5 years old.
Ekythump
Nov 1, 2010 9:04 AM
Zhaker.

Just becuase people bought them doesn't mean they're also willing to pay a monthly sub to play them on line. They're free to play at the moment but what do you think will happen if the Multiplayer part went monthly sub?
Kraz3
Nov 1, 2010 9:28 PM
I'd rip their balls off.
somemadcaaant
Nov 2, 2010 7:44 PM
Oh cmon ppl...

whats wrong with paying for a subscription? Plus tourney fees, plus micro-transaction fees (wtf?!), plus Internet access costs with land-line, electricity costs that are rising, rent always rising, mobile bills, rising fuel costs, females shoe expenses... oh and those poor bastards that pay for xbox live/psn extra subs, plus your old faithful wow account subs... holy shit where did my paycheck go?!

Ahem... cough, @T#O$R$R%E^N&T*S burrrp, fart... pardon me 8)

-smc
wayke
Nov 2, 2010 10:15 PM
All these Companys are cutting their own throats Promoting this Pay more for less all of you kids paying for these games FROM EA CRAPTOVISION ETC Flogging last years Junk with a new model and skin, Which have nothing on the original game at all what they're doing is Trying to generate revenue from garbage they make all these outragous claims to Latest cutting edge blah blah blah most of the time it's a game engine from 5 years ago that failed in some way they brought it on the cheap dodgey it up to work only to discover that 50% of users that brought it can't play it ranging in things from BSOD Cascading hardware Failure induced by the Game itself Hence the Release day Patches GTA 4 OMG on xbox ps3 and PC FAIL MUCH at selling something to millions of people for it to function like a retarded Headbanging Narcoleptic Goat in a Storm of clapping hands,
Charging people for these GAMES IS EXTORTION FRAUD ALL THOSE COMPANYS SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR SELLING UNDERDEVELOPED AND POORLY MADE PUT TOGETHER GAMES WHICH ARE SUPPOSED TO BE INTERACTIVE STORYS ETC BUT YOU FOOLS KEEP ON BUYING SAD CLOWNS LAUGH AT YOU ALL.
Metasynaptic
Nov 3, 2010 10:08 AM
Dude, you need some valium, I think.
Hawkeye
Nov 3, 2010 10:36 AM
That is one hell of a rant right there. Wow.
somemadcaaant
Nov 3, 2010 11:08 AM
I feel like a dirty dirty $2 hooker after reading wayke's post(no offence if that'ts your profession and here's my number 0405321...)

Wayke has a point tho. They tend to be underdeveloped most of the time, plus another excuse to ship the game earlier.
jdog
Nov 3, 2010 12:02 PM
maybe a new section,hawkeye? rant of the month? (ROTM)

go with the idne games like torchlight,great fun...
zzhi13
Nov 19, 2010 11:25 PM
Christmas was approaching . Everyone must was looking forward to it and was preparing for it

. me too . so im willing to share with you a website === http://www.bingshop.us/ =====
free shipping accept the paypal

Best quality, Best reputation , Best services

=== http://www.bingshop.us/ =====

=== http://www.bingshop.us/ =====

jordan air max oakland raiders $34–39;

Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini $25;

Christan Audigier BIKINI JACKET $25;



coach chanel gucci LV handbags $36;

coogi DG edhardy gucci t-shirts $18;

=== http://www.bingshop.us/ =====

=== http://www.bingshop.us/ =====
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 137 | June, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop