Electronic Arts' CEO announces an epic marketing campaign to help Battlefield 3 take down the next CoD title. But is this asking too much?
At the Ad Age Digital Conference held in New York overnight, Electronic Arts' CEO John Riccitiello announced just how hard the company will be pushing the DICE developed Battlefield 3. And that is... very damn hard.
BF3 is going to get a marketing budget of about $100 million when it launches in November. Given that's the same time that the next Call of Duty will be out, with a no doubt similar budget. "This November, we're launching Battlefield 3. It's going up against the next Call of Duty, which is presently the number one game in the game industry," he said in his Ad Age keynote. "A game that last year did $400 million dollars in revenue on day one. [Battlefield 3] is designed to take that game down."
It's great to see just how passionate EA is about pushing Battlefield 3, but we're also a little concerned about the company setting its aim so high.
Call of Duty, traditionally, is aimed at a console audience, and much of the game's evolution over the last few iterations has been in that direction. And it's a fair move, too, as that is doubtless where the money is. Battlefield 3, however, is being touted by DICE is primarily a PC game.
So how is EA expecting to go up against CoD, and still win? As good as we're expecting BF3 to be, surely it simply cannot have the broad appeal of something like Black Ops. And do PC gamers even want it to?
We're not sure how EA and DICE is going to solve this conundrum, of developing a game that's as rich and PC-centric as has been promised, while still delivering an accessible game that can be easily mastered and played by a wide audience. But we're sure interested in how it turns out.
Do you think EA can juggle the challenge?
Issue: 137 | June, 2012