Sunday November 22, 2009 6:20 AM AEST
David Field

Stop lying to me about what I 'need'.

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
More by David Field
Latest Opinions
By David Field
Oct 2, 2008 | 12 Comments
Consumer digital displays (oh alright, LCD TVs and some LCD computer monitors) are getting steadily better across the board. But in an attempt to lure customers, the companies that make them have resorted to adding crap to their displays that reduces the overall picture quality.

I'm talking about the new evil in displays -- dynamic contrast ratio.

Contrast ratio is the ratio of the blackest black a screen can produce compared to its brightest white; and it's also the most useless measurement in video. Results can vary wildly. Measurements in an all black room can be double the measurements in the same room with a white ceiling, because the light from the display can bounce and reflect off the screen, which raises the brightness of the black areas of the image.

Dynamic contrast ratio, however, is like Cold Power: it claims to make your whites whiter and your blacks blacker. It's a way of trying to fake depth and richness, but because the screens it's built into are actually quite deep and rich without the feature, it's not only unnecessary but it manages to mangle your video in the process.

And more importantly, it's easy to mislead people with the inaccurate measurements taken when dynamic contrast ratio systems are running.

Dynamic contrast ratio systems work by detecting the median brightness of the image. If a scene exceeds or drops below set brightness or darkness thresholds, the contrast ratio is increased or the backlight that illuminates the image is dimmed to make the scene appear brighter or darker respectively.

It generally takes about half a second for this system to detect and change the display’s settings. So what happens if a dark scene strobes white for a moment, and then returns to dark? The display suddenly turns up both the brightness and contrast, and then turns them both down again. This can happen over the course of a second. Yet for the vast majority of that time, your image has been displaying the dark scene.

Directors, broadcast engineers and image technicians have many complex systems to ensure that images are repeatedly and accurately displayed on monitors, cameras, colour correction facilities and cinemas. But they can’t account for the millions of differently calibrated TVs in homes all over the world, so they get the signal as close to what can be considered 'normal' for as many sets as they can, then send it out to you.

But now your TV is messing with the brightness and contrast dials like a rhesus monkey conditioned to getting a nicotine hit after twisting the dials.

Unpredictably changing the setup of a display on the fly destroys the underlying emotional response evoked from the visual stimulus that directors and image professionals work so hard to evoke with their calibrated gear. That bright light in the distance of a dark scene isn’t as bright any more, and those slow, fluid cross-fades from bright to dark scenes are suddenly jerky and uneven as they are butchered by the dynamic contrast setting.

And all for what? A bigger, useless, arbitrary number to tackily scrawl on a piece of cardboard that gets stuck on the side of the display in a store.

This is just the latest instance of technical marketing taking advantage of people’s cluelessness. It’s in the same league as the megapixel race in the world of handheld cameras -- where a higher number doesn't mean a better image. You can prove this by printing two images; one from a 6 megapixel camera-phone, and one from a 6 megapixel Canon 300D.

Your image resolution (measured in megapixels, or millions of pixels) is proportional to the number of photosites on the sensor of your camera. Photosites detect and react to light, then record the information as a value for the pixels that make up an image. They usually get less than a 25th of a second to bathe in light and record a value. To get more megapixels on a sensor, you need to add more photosites. Because the area of the sensor is fixed, the photosites have to be shrunk before more can be added. The smaller the photosites are, the less light they get to bathe in, the lower the values they return and the more you have to turn up the gain up on the output to get a usable image. Which leads to a noisy and rubbish photo.

If your engineers don’t have the resources to design more sensitive photosites to compensate for this, but you still need to increase the resolution of your sensor, you can resort to interpolation. This can add as much resolution as you want the sensor to pick up, but goes all diminishing returns on you as you try and squeeze more detail out of it. The theory is simple: guess what the values of your hypothetical pixels would be and add those approximations to your image to increase t3h m3gapix3lz!!1!LOL!.

Why increase the pixel count if it's not going to give you higher quality images? Because if you stand at the camera counter at any electronics store and listen to what people with credit cards at the ready are asking, the most common question people want answered is "How many megapixels has it got?".

Sadly, even though numbers aren't everything, the ‘more is better’ yardstick is the only easily comprehensible way for consumers to try and quantify quality. People are scared of knowing anything more detailed than that.

It’s why you see VGA webcams (which have 640 x 480, or 0.3 megapixel sensors) ‘delivering’ 8 megapixel images. It’s why there are phones with 10 megapixel cameras onboard.

It’s why dynamic contrast ratio exists.

And it cheapens the effort that goes into making technology that makes images legitimately better.

And it makes me angry.
 
12 Comments
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Felipe
Oct 2, 2008 6:14 PM
 Amen.


FX.
SceptreCore
Oct 2, 2008 6:17 PM
 Yes but out of all this DCR makes the "Consumer digital displays" use less energy then static contrast ratio.

And it does affect the viewing pleasure of movies
smadge1
Oct 2, 2008 6:46 PM
 what's with the engadget hate?
GhostFaceKilla
Oct 2, 2008 8:02 PM
 Im angry too. oooo my blood is boiling.

/goes back to watching SONY TRINITRON CRT TV.
Dr Doom
Oct 3, 2008 8:14 AM
 Agreed
+1
SyKRyD
Oct 3, 2008 10:17 AM
 this is an example of what separates the geeks and everyone else. how many of you try to work out how something works? try to understand the things that you buy, you use, you work with tick? how many of you have partners, friends and family that don't have or don't want to have this knowledge. no matter how much you try to explain something, they are happy with to live out their ignorant lives. that is, until their computer breaks down and they need someone to fix it. or they've just realised that the new expensive plasma they just bought, doesnt have a hdmi out for their pvr.

i swear, geeks will one day rule the world when all the ignorant and clueless all die off from darwin's theory.
R430R
Oct 4, 2008 11:13 AM
 I think it's a little ironic....please, call me crazy....but when I got to the bottom of this article I noticed that there were two advertisements one for LCD TV's and one for a CAMERA :S.
And sceptrecore ya gotta remember we're geeks.......we make computers that blow fuses...we need fire extinguishers next to our computers when we enter our BIOS as a "JUST IN CASE" scenario...Dude we don't care about power hey LOL

Remember an orange is an orange and technology is technology.....to conquer with both without making a mess ya gotta be smart :)
SceptreCore
Oct 5, 2008 2:30 PM
 You may not R430R, but the more discerning members of the public that pay bills do. I checked out my monitors power usage before purchase, and it's quite a good one.

I know that DCR is all just about the range the backlight can dim.... but if it keeps the picture looking just that bit better then the others with a lesser range... does it really matter.

David there isn't anything to be mad about, this is what happens to technology when engineers don't know what the next phase is.... they just improve whats there (and charge a premium for it) Once they know what will next revolutionize how our pixels are displayed.... then the train will role again.
colganaitor
Oct 7, 2008 1:49 AM
 Wow. I'll remember this when I need a camera.
wheelz
Oct 9, 2008 12:29 AM
 I actually DE-PC'D and looked at all the screens in action before I decided to buy. I went with my own DVD and if the Shop wouldn't oblige, I moved on.
I bought the one that looked the best with my control DVD.

I didn't even look at stats, other than to make sure it was full HD.
Because I spent a pretty penny, and I originally liked the picture quality, NO_ONE can stop my wood while watching it. I love it. In a disturbing way :)

It has DCR. Sigh.

^Faldo^
Oct 13, 2008 10:51 PM
 @wheelz:

Then turn it off!

-DAVE.
AnthraxPants
Oct 23, 2008 3:43 PM
 Research, research, research! You can save a lot of dough if you understand a little about what you purchase. I saved between $100 to $150 on most of the major components in my last upgrade, allowing me to buy better gear and get very good 'bang for buck'. Articles like this one are very helpful when considering what to buy.

wheelz - If your screen does not have an option to turn off dynamic contrast ratio you may be able to disable it by changing to movie or cinema mode.
Login or register to submit a comment.
 
Area 53
 
Editor's Choice
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 107 | December, 2009

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
"happy morning to you all. decided to make use of my optus off-peak usage and watch the HD ..."
on Watch Avatar today!
by SlickGrunt | Nov 22, 2009 5:48 AM
 
"Signed"
on Queensland takes on Atkinson!
by Vanoyen | Nov 22, 2009 3:32 AM
 
"I got an XP pro oem with a game build rig 18 months ago and continued to ignore Vista, to my ..."
on Windows 7: Fastest selling OS ever
by TonyB | Nov 21, 2009 10:24 PM
 
"Holy shit, batman.

*runs"
on Intel's six-core Gulftown is performing well
by colganaitor | Nov 21, 2009 7:17 PM
 
""sudo preupgrade"
...failed to download installer metadata
------------
So ..."
on Fedora 12 is released
by wlayton27 | Nov 21, 2009 8:16 AM

Plan Finder

Powered by WhistleOut

1) Samsung S8000 Jet8 plans 50%
2) Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB35 plans 30%
3) Blackberry Curve 85206 plans 17%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 32GB35 plans 36%
5) Nokia E7147 plans 2%
Three iiNet Virgin Mobile Vodafone
« 1 of »
1) iiNet32 plans 4%
2) Netspace33 plans 32%
3) Optus47 plans 18%
4) Telstra BigPond41 plans 10%
5) Internode34 plans 10%

Compare: Mobiles | Broadband

Atomic MPC
Latest User Reviews
Shenmue II
10%
Shenmue II
asdfasdf
By jeffreybushii | Nov 13, 2009
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
EVGA X58 Classified
great board, a few things could be better
By -adicolor93- | Nov 2, 2009
 
EVGA X58 Classified
90%
EVGA X58 Classified
Gorgeous looking
By kramgref | Oct 29, 2009
 
Sapphire 4890
90%
Sapphire 4890
So good, I immediately wanted a second one!
By prof_skum | Sep 20, 2009
 
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
90%
MSI 790FX-GD70 motherboard
Allmost the prefect gaming board
By George copley | Aug 28, 2009
 
more user reviews »