Friday February 10, 2012 3:06 AM AEST

EVGA GTS250

By Justin Robinson
11:10 Oct 19, 2009 | 11 Comments
Tags: EVGA | GTS250 | video | card | review
EVGA GTS250
 
Performance:
76%
Bundle:
75%
Value:
84%
Build:
80%
81
---
Verdict:
A decent card, but lacks speed.

Less doof-doof, more gaming, from EVGA.

Graphics cards don't usually contain fuel-injected engines within their sleek silicon bodies, so the picture on the front of this one is a little misleading. What it does tell (or at least hint at) is that this card has had a little tweaking under the hood, courtesy of the engineers at EVGA. Sadly a teensy overclock is the only thing different here, bumped up from a stock core clock of 738MHz to a gruntier 756MHz. Just like a hotrodder will tune their engine to show off to their peers, so have EVGA - the difference is that this isn't all that astounding.Built around the same G92 core that has been used in ten bajillion cards since its inception, this is essentially the equivalent of buying a V3 engine for your supercar shell - it just doesn't have enough cylinders to give a decent amount of power.

There are only 128 stream processors here compared to the GTX285's top-of-the-NVIDIA-pile 240 processors, which really hurts. A standard fuel tank with enough for 512MB of datafuel keeps the card running, connected with a 256-bit memory bus. DDR3 is naturally the order of the day, and has been used for quite some time in these kinds of cards.

754 million transistors burn through calculations inside the core, producing a sedate 37 degrees and 55.4dBA idle, but ramping up to 65 degrees and 58.3dBA with the pedal to the metal. This is pretty typical and shouldn't be too loud inside a case with other fans whirring away.

The cooler fitted to this card is your bog-standard reference design, with a squirrel-cage fan at one end sucking in cool air to pull through the rest of the card. There are a series of aluminium fins mounted to a solid aluminium block, which is extruded to run the length of the card and also cools the memory chips. All the solid capacitors and power regulation bits are hidden underneath the cooler's black plastic exoskeleton. A PCIe 2.0 slot is included as standard (with leather being an optional extra). Since this core doesn't need huge amounts of power to run only a 6-pin PCIe connector is needed, and EVGA include a molex adapter in the box just in case. Display options are pretty standard too at two DVI and a single analogue video out, with two SLI nipples at the top of the card and an SPDIF header to pipe digital audio through the DVI port, eventually hitting HDMI through an adapter straight into an amp or TV.

EVGA also threw in a copy of its Precision overclocking tool, which runs much like Rivatuner but works especially well with EVGA cards. Don't bother getting it from EVGA's site (you need to register), but there's plenty of other sites with it if you want to have a play around. We overclocked the card with our usual method; raising the core clock while tied to the shader clock, then the memory, and finally a run-through to make sure the settings are good. Our final speed was up 13 per cent to 855MHz on the core (+99MHz), seven per cent to 1180MHz on memory (+80MHz) and 2076MHz on the shader (+240MHz). This is an adequate result, but didn't offer huge amounts of performance.

The small stock overclock did give a noticeable change though, gaining a few hundred points extra in 3D06/Vantage. It went competently in Crysis, but as soon as it hit GRID's large resolution and settings it crapped out a bit, the 512MB memory filling up quickly and causing significant slowdown. This card is a decent value choice for budget gamers, but for those playing at high res or higher quality settings, look elsewhere. 

click to view full size image

 
Product Info
Specs:
756MHz core; 1100MHz (2200MHz effective) memory; 1836MHz shader; G92 core; 128 stream processors; 512MB GDDR3; 256-bit memory interface; dual-slot active cooler; one six-pin power connector
Supplier:
Price when reviewed:
AUD$215
price check*
$153.07 EVGA PCIe GTS250 512MB HDMI
Digitan Technology (NSW)
$160.28 EVGA PCIe GTS250 512MB
Digitan Technology (NSW)
$166.32 EVGA PCIe GTS250 1024MB HDMI
Digitan Technology (NSW)
$192.54 EVGA PCIe GTS250 1024MB
Digitan Technology (NSW)
$479.71 EVGA PCIe GTX275 1280MB PhysX GTS250
Digitan Technology (NSW)
*Products and prices sourced from staticICE and are in no way associated with Atomic MPC Powered by
 
This article appeared in the September, 2009 issue of Atomic.

Behind the scenes with Mass Effect 3! GTX 560 VGA round-up! Essential Skyrim tweaks to improve your game! Plus reviews, news, hardware, more games, and easy to following modding guides for PC builders. ON SALE NOW!
11 Comments
qwakqwak
Oct 19, 2009 11:40 AM
the GTS250 is just a revamp of a revamp isn't it??

8800GT -> 9800GT -> GTS250??

It is a hell of a lot cheaper than its predecessors though
Mr.B
Oct 19, 2009 11:44 AM
hmmmmm for a budget card i like it, but i wouldnt buy it for me.
Fat_Bodybuilder
Oct 19, 2009 12:29 PM
I lol'd at "V3". And this card is a waste of time when you can get a 9800GT for $160 - $170.

Mudg3
Oct 19, 2009 1:01 PM
Its just my 2 9800gtx's renamed again...
A Hitman
Oct 19, 2009 2:06 PM
wait its a 9800GTX not GT.
Or is the 9800GTX an overclocked gt?
Mudg3
Oct 19, 2009 2:30 PM
9800gtx was an overclocked 9800gt. The GT250 is just a 9800gtx overclocked a little. My 2 cards core runs at stock 740 shader 1863 memory 1170.
RaRaDawg
Oct 19, 2009 10:37 PM
@ quak: 9800GTX had more Shader Processors, slightly more texture units, and a higher clock speed.
9800GTX+ and GTS 250 was the revamp. They were based on a G92+ instead of the G92. That's where the 55nm process came from.
@ FB: Should be cheaper, or else anybody would pick up this GTS 250 over a 9800GT for only $10 more.
@ Mudg3: I think you have the 9800GTX+... not the 9800GTX.
RaRaDawg
Oct 19, 2009 10:37 PM
@ quak: 9800GTX had more Shader Processors, slightly more texture units, and a higher clock speed.
9800GTX+ and GTS 250 was the revamp. They were based on a G92+ instead of the G92. That's where the 55nm process came from.
@ FB: Should be cheaper, or else anybody would pick up this GTS 250 over a 9800GT for only $10 more.
@ Mudg3: I think you have the 9800GTX+... not the 9800GTX.
Mudg3
Oct 19, 2009 11:01 PM
Nope I have a 9800gtx not the plus version I bought these before it came out.
RaRaDawg
Oct 20, 2009 7:13 AM
Oh, because, the stock runs at 675/1688/1100. Maybe you have the Triple X edition or like a Black version.
Mudg3
Oct 20, 2009 8:55 AM
Yep Triple X mate.
Comments have been disabled on this article.
 
Latest Competitions
 
Atomic Magazine

Issue: 133 | February, 2012

Atomic is a magazine aimed squarely at computer enthusiasts, gamers, and serious PC upgraders.

Every month we bring you the latest reviews of new technology and PC components, in depth features on everything from overclocking to console hacking, and gaming previews and interviews.
 
Latest Comments
 
Latest User Reviews
Battlefield 3 is the new benchmark online FPS
90%
A very fun and realistic multiplayer ride.
 
Antec Kuhler 920 - liquid cool
90%
Antec Kuhler 920 silent but effientive out of the box no maintence water cooling kit
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
Antec Lan boy Air in red a very cool design
 
Antec's Lanboy Air - our new favourite case
90%
This product overall is awesome.
 
MSI's GT780 laptop as fast as it gets
90%
Nice laptop
 
 
Close Get the February, 2012 issue of Atomic mailed to you for $8.95, including postage.

SubscribeBuy nowDigital Version